18 Mayıs 2005 Çarşamba

The Jolly Green Giant - What's wrong with the David McCulloughs of history

What's wrong with the David McCulloughs of history

An interesting look at popular published history that addresses lots of the barriers I hit in the process of crashing and burning in my academic career:

A number of our own practices lead us away from engaging the public as we should. I've seen students entering graduate school aspiring to write like Arthur Schlesinger, only to be shunted into producing pinched, monographic studies. I've seen conferences full of brilliant minds unable to find an interesting presentation to attend that isn't literally read off the page in a soporific drone. We write too much for each other—and, as we do, a public hungry for good history walks into Barnes & Noble and gets handed vapid mythmaking that uninformed critics ratify as "magisterial" or "definitive."

Thankfully, historians now seem to be recognizing all this as a problem. At one point, many academics seemed to consider popularity a first step into the Hades of commercialization and dumbing down. But today, most of my peers, myself included, seem eager to publish with trade presses, to write op-ed pieces about our research, or to appear on NPR and Charlie Rose—not just because we want the ego boost (though who wouldn't?), but because we enjoy discovering new audiences who respond intelligently to our ideas.


It also provides enough suggestions to fill up anyone's summer reading list.

Hiç yorum yok:

Yorum Gönder