Republicans etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Republicans etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

2 Şubat 2009 Pazartesi

Cross-tabbing Religion and Obama

The Main Sequence: Cross-tabbing Religion and Obama

A Gallup poll which ran over the weekend notes that Vermont identifies itself as the least religious state. As usual with such things I cross-tabbed it against Obama's share of the vote.



I found some of what I expected: the more self-identified "religious" states leaned redder and vice versa. But there were a couple of interesting clusters and as I mulled it over I was reminded of nothing so much as... astronomy?



Astronomers describe stars with what they call the Main Sequence. This chard is what's called a Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (universally abbreviated to "H-R") which plots luminosity against mass. In general, the more massive the star, the hotter it burns. Most stars fall somewhere on the Main Sequence, which runs from blue giants through ordinary Sun-like stars to red dwarves.

And much like the stars, the states graph out diagonally. Even the colors match: bluer on the upper, less religious left, and the heavily Republican red religious states on the lower right.

But the H-R Diagram has a couple of odd clusters, in the corners opposite the ends of the Main Sequence: white dwarves and red giants.

There are no red giants, massive yet cool, on the upper right of the political chart. Though Texas would qualify as a huge red political Antares or Betelgeuse, no states are at once highly religious and strongly Democratic. (If North Carolina gets a little more Democratic, it might edge up that way.)

But there is a cluster in the lower left where the white dwarves hang out, less religious yet more Republican. They are Ronald Reagan's Sagebrush Rebellion states: Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Arizona, and Alaska. The last two may have been more GOP than average in 2008 because they were represented on the ticket. Remember for a couple weeks, just before the Palin pick, when Alaska was at the fringes of in-play? Montana was a possibility till the end, and Arizona went for Bill Clinton in `96 and would likely have been in play if not for McCain being the nominee.

These white-dwarf, libertarian states had smiliar voting performance to the "red dwarf" states at the lover right, highly religious and weak for Obama. It's a predictable cluster: South Carolina, Tennessee, Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, Mississippi.

There's an odd, two-state bridge of sorts between the Sagebrush west and the fundamentalist South: Utah and Oklahoma. They're moving in opposite directions. Utah trended a little Democratic this time; still very Republican but Obama actually carried Salt Lake County. Oklahoma, more Southern than Western, trended Republican and McCain won every county (the only state where he can make that claim).

Republicans have a choice here, and Democrats have an opportunity with the white dwarves. If the GOP retreats to the religious base, they risk alienating places like Arizona, and similar spots like Colorado and Nevada that they held until this year. For the Democrats, moving down the main sequence, the Dakotas and Nebraska are a better bet for the future, at least for the Obama era, than the Appalachia belt of West Virginia and Kentucky.

Other than that, some of the neighboring pairs are interesting. Some are obvious: the Dakotas, Washington-Oregon. I can see where Iowa and Minnesota are similar, right in the middle like the Sun, but matched with Pennsylvania? Wisconsin-New Jersey? The two closest pairs that voted differently were Indiana-Missouri and North Carolina-Georgia. Good signs for 2012.

David Duke on Steele

What's an Illinois Nazi to do?



David Duke, who not all that long ago damn near got elected governor of Louisiana, ain't happy with new GOP chair Michael Steele:
"I am glad these traitorous leaders of the Republican Party appointed this Black racist, affirmative action advocate to the head of the Republican party because this will lead to a huge revolt among the Republican base. We will either take the Republican Party back over the next four years or we will say, “To Hell With the Republican Party!” And we will take 90 percent of Republicans with us into a New Party that will take its current place!"

UPDATE: Worst... Person... in the Woooooooooooooorld!

Does this kind of cross-burning, sheet-wearing reptile even matter anymore? Politico thinks it does, if only a little: "There is a serious question of whether this could push real committed racists, a small, but real and voting, minority, away from the GOP. Hard to see them returning to what's now the party of Barack Obama."

It's hard to gauge because it's hard to poll. You might see a tiny electoral uptick for something like the Constitution Party, but that's a micrometer measure. Oooh, they went from o.o2% to 0.04%. What's more likely is the Illinois Nazis will retreat further into their caves and emerge to vote GOP in an against-Obama way.

Obama, for his part, pulled off one of the all-time great zingers Saturday night:
"I am seriously glad to be here tonight at the annual Alfalfa dinner. I know that many you are aware that this dinner began almost one hundred years ago as a way to celebrate the birthday of General Robert E. Lee. If he were here with us tonight, the General would be 202 years old. And very confused."

For the record, I hate Illinois Nazis.

30 Ocak 2009 Cuma

Steele Elected GOP chair

New RNC chair has no ties to Bangles or Deeth

Let me immediately stop any rumors that new RNC chair Michael Steele is any relation to my wife Koni Steele.

I know the GOP was in search of a new direction with their new chair, but what are they thinking, going with the bass player from the `80s all-gal band the Bangles?



What's that?

Former lieutenant governor of Maryland?

So one of the two black guys beat the all-white country club guy and the Barack the Magic Negro guy. So give them credit; the GOP, or at least a plurality of the national committee, has realized that the appearance of a lily white party is a problem. And if they were going that route, better Steele than Ken "Vote Suppression" Blackwell.

Chris Matthews didn't win any friends among the viewers of the official Democrat channel, MSNBC, by noting not once but TWICE that he voted for Steele in the 2006 Maryland Senate race (That sound you heard was Mathews' old boss Tip O'Neill stirring in his oversized grave). Steele made that race much closer than he should have, and almost pulled it off in a very blue state in a horrible GOP year. (Some of that was residual racial politics; Democrat Ben Cardin narrowly beat former congressman and NAACP chair Kwesi Mfume in the Democratic primary.)

I'm old enough to remember Jack Kemp, in the "enterprise zone" days, saying he wouldn't rest until the District of Columbia voted Republican. But that vision died with the Reagan Welfare Queen speech and Willie Horton and the Jesse Helms white hands ad. But this isn't about actually winning black votes. That dream is way on a back burner, with the pilot light out, through the Obama era. It's about addressing the Nixon-Wallace-Reagan alignment era perception that the Republicans are the White Backlash Party. It worked for the GOP from 1968 to 2004, but it works against them now. Moderate whites are uncomfortable in a Trent Lott party, and Steele makes it looks like they're trying. And if that kind of mindset is banished beyond the pale of American politics, it's good for all of us. (The next, and harder, trick for the GOP: balancing a growing Hispanic voting demographic with the nativist, don't make me push 1 for English mood of the GOP grassroots).

Of course this isn't just, or even mostly race, politics, and it's certainly not tokenism. Steele seems to have been the best of the bunch (but that's not really saying much). Chair matters more in the out party than in the in party. Steele should be a good talking head on the Sunday shows, more appealing than, say, Mitch McConnell or John Boehner.



A Talking Head.

That's only part of the job; running the party is the other part. Krusty has some insightful comments on what this means for Iowa:
Some are quick to think that the election of Steele means the end of the Iowa Caucuses. I don’t necessarily agree with that sentiment even though I’m worried. If Steele is a chairman who enforces the rules and doesn’t allow any shenanigans from a few larger states wishing to crash our party we will be fine... To be really honest with you, if (Michigan candidate) Anuzis would have been the one that put Steele over the top I’d be more worried than I currently am.


But the real question is, can he walk like an Egyptian?

7 Aralık 2008 Pazar

Republican Win, Republicans Fight

Republican Win, Republicans Fight: The Ethnic Undercurrents

I'm going to take a moment here and cheer for a Republican win. No, it's not April 1st.

In New Orleans, corrupt Rep. William Jefferson got knocked off by the GOP yesterday, and good riddance to the guy with 90 large in the freezer. Republican Anh Cao will go down in history as 1) the first Vietnamese-American in Congress and 2) the Michael Flanagan of 2008.

I'd rather have a Democrat in the seat, of course. It's better to battle such things out in the primary. But New Orleans Dems tried twice and the field splintered. So in this case, a Republican win was the best outcome. A Kos diarist says it best: "We'll probably knock him out in 2010 (it's a D+28 district), but losing one seat for one term is a price I'm willing to pay to get Jefferson out of office."

Back in grad school, I taught logic, and when you argue from the universal (all A are B), you're on dangerous ground. Only one counter-example, one B that is not A, disproves your whole argument. And that's the problem with party loyalty tests: they argue that EVERY member of your party, under EVERY conceivable circumstance, is better than EVERY member of any other party. In this case, party loyalty is less important than eliminating the embarrassment that was Jefferson, and there's your counter-example. As the Ramones said, glad to see you go, go, go, go, goodbye.



On this end of the Mississippi, Iowa Republicans are grappling with their own loyalty issue. At the Iowa GOP state central committee meeting. RNC member Kim Lehman was censured on an 8-7 vote for comments the Iowa Right To Life (sic) newsletter made about Mariannette Miller-Meeks.

The battle is playing itself out in public. "Kim Lehman has completely shredded her credibility as a leader in our party," writes Miller-Meeks campaign manager political director Todd Versteegh in the comments at Hawkeye GOP. "She CLEARLY stated at the State Convention that as National Committeewoman she would support all Republican candidates..and then she publicly and falsely attacked a Republican nominee 20 DAYS out from the general election."




The Republican central committee also set the state chair election for Jan. 10. Many candidates have emerged and the Republican blogs Questions Comments Insults and Hawkeye GOP have better roundups than I can provide.

One ticket is headed by longtime activist Gopal Krishna, with Polk County chair Ted Sporer for co-chair. (Why do Republicans in Iowa call their number two person a "co-chair" instead of a "vice-chair"?) From what I can gather, Krishna is a strong personality and there's folks who don't like him.

Krishna's ethnic background may also be a factor. Commentator kbf of linn at Krusty Konservative noted Krishna's accent and said: "It's hard to understand people that has accent. We have a former house candidate here in Linn County and it was hard to understand her. who knows if that was the reason why she lost?"

The remark clearly refers to House 29 candidate Emma Nemecek, a native of the Philippines. Contrast this with Louisiana, where Cao's win gives the Republicans a little diversity; other than Cao and the three south Florida Cuban-Americans, the House Republicans are all white Anglo.

Renee at Essential Estrogen was quick to react. "Emma Nemecek has an accent. So does George Bush for that matter KBF, and sometimes someone had to interpret what he was saying to us. Gonna complain about that too? Why don't you get up and do something instead of nailing Emma to the wall?"

Nemecek may also have lost because House 29 is half in the People's Republic of Johnson County and because her opponents, Ro Foege and Nate Willems, were good candidates. An accent doesn't seemed to have kept Democrat Swati Dandekar from three wins in a nearby district. In fact, she suffered an email attack on her ethnicity just before her first election, and that backfired badly enough that the state GOP pulled the plug on her opponent.




America is changing, and not to the GOP's advantage. One of the few things I'll give W credit for is that in his early and mid terms he at least paid lip service to making the GOP more diverse.

Karl Rove is evil, but not stupid. Back when W was running for governor he looked at Texas demographics and saw the Hispanic percentage increasing, and realized that a lily-white GOP is not viable in the long run

Unfortunately for the Republicans, they don't have much left but the base. And the base is Know-Nothing on immigration and diversity. We forget how hot the immigration fight was in the summer of 2007, and post-Postville it's sure to flare up again.

The Republican base doesn't like to hear the person in front of them in the Wal-Mart line speaking Spanish, and in its guts likes Tom Tancredo's simplistic 'enforce the law' "solution". To me that sounds like code for "round them up and send them back," somehow extricating 11 million undocumented Americans from the society, culture, and economy.

The struggle over race and diversity in America isn't over just because we've elected a black president. A more ethnically diverse GOP, with more Anh Caos and Emma Nemeceks, might be bad for the Democrats electorally, but it would be good for America.

4 Aralık 2008 Perşembe

Iowa Republican Infights

Republican Infight Update

Iowa Republicans are going through some soul-searching the the wake of last month's defeats, and the in-fight action is playing itself out in the Iowa rightosphere.

Republican National Committee member Kim Lehman, who also heads Iowa Right To Life (sic), is under attack from 2nd District GOP leaders for an IRTL newsletter that called congressional candidate Mariannette Miller-Meeks a "great pretender" on the issue and said, "Miller-Meeks is pro-abortion."

Republican activists, or at least those with blogs, believed Miller-Meeks had a chance, despite the lack of national-level external indicators. But she lost to incumbent Dave Loebsack by 19 points.

There were a lot of reasons for that. True, MMM has a good backstory, and she did well in the district's southwest tier. But Miller-Meeks kept pointing out how often Loebsack voted with Democratic leadership as if that were a bad thing. I think that just reinforced Loebsack's bona fides in a Democratic district. And it was just a great Democratic year, a great Obama year, and Loebsack got on the Obama train early. It takes a compelling argument to knock off a congressional incumbent. Loebsack's Leach-as-enabler case was effective; MMM's "do-nothing Dave" wasn't.

The GOP can't retroactively change the national climate or MMM's campaign tactics. But they can punish those in their own midst. Lehman says she was not reponsible for the newsletter, but a group of county chairs is calling for Lehman's removal from the RNC. O. Kay Henderson of Radio Iowa has a nice backgrounder.

A lot of Republicans were unhappy with Lehman's election to begin with. A sizable faction at the state convention favored outgoing legislator Sandy Greiner, and a... recall, do-over, or whatever effort against Lehman is a key proxy war in the ongoing direction battle between Money Republicans and Jesus Republicans. (A gross oversimplification, but you get the idea.)

"The only reason a National Committeeman or Committeewoman can be removed from office is if they do not support the Republican nominee for President or Vice President," writes Krusty Konservative. (Republican Party rules seem to be stricter than Senate Democratic caucus rules.) "While I don’t have any problem with people being upset with Lehman, they need to voice their opinions one last time and move on. Additionally, Kim has a lot of work to do to clean up her image."




Republicans are also choosing a new state chair, as former legislator Stew Iverson departs after a short and electorally unsuccessful tenure. Grant Young at Questions Comments Insults has both a good summary and a distinctive writing style. Seriously, lefty readers, you should get over to the right side of the web more. Gotta know what they're up to. Here's a few of my regular stops:

  • Battleground Iowa
  • Iowa Defense Alliance
  • The Conservative Reader
  • Ted Sporer and David Chung don't post a lot but they're party insiders who say what they're thinking in public. (But Ted, nothing since November 7?)
  • God, Politics and Rock 'n' Roll is Iowa's own Carville and Matalin team, and Essential Estrogen has recently added a Republican as well.
  • And Iowas News Liter will keep you up to date on snark, and the scientific community is united in that fact.
  • 22 Kasım 2008 Cumartesi

    Possible 2012 candidate Bobby Jindal in Cedar Rapids

    Jindal praises faith-based help in Cedar Rapids

    “The heroes in these storms are not the federal government, they're the people,” Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal told a Cedar Rapids crowd at a flood recovery event that looked a lot like a Republican Party breakfast.

    The ballots aren't even counted yet, literally (Linn County is still working on a recount in the 14-vote Renee Schulte-Art Staed legislative race) but the opening shots of the 2012 Iowa caucuses are being fired. Mike Huckabee was here two days ago, now Jindal.

    Ostensibly the speech was a non-partisan “Rapid Recovery” event, followed by a tour of areas damaged in the summer flood, but you wouldn't know it from the crowd. A partial list of GOP dignitaries in the crowd of 150: Secretary of Agriculture Bill Northey, state party co-chair Leon Mosley, ex-congressional candidate Mariannette Miller-Meeks, ex-legislative candidate Emma Nemecek, Johnson County GOP chair Bill Keettel, new county supervisor Brent Oleson, state central committee member and blogger David Chung... the only way I knew this wasn't officially a Republican campaign event was the lack of patriotic ritual and rally music. The only Democrat I recognized was mayor Kay Halloran.

    Congressional primary loser Peter Teahen spoke early; a civic thing or a political thing? He was on the ground doing Red Cross work at Katrina, so there's that connection. “There is a new age of leadership in Louisiana today.” Making recovery partisan? He wouldn't be the first to politicize the Katrina aftermath...heck, that's a big part of why Jindal even is governor. Of course, Bobby almost won in 2003. How would all this have been different if Katrina had been on Jindal's watch instead of Blanco's?

    We'll keep an eye on Peter Teahen the next couple years; MMM is already looking like she's running again. “Faith based groups will attract donations that will not go to government agencies,” says Teahen, and he rolls with that a while.

    No TV or national press present, just print (AP's Glover, Gazette's Lynch) and bloggers (EE/II's Waddington), plus a couple Louisiana press. Teahen pronounces “bureaucracy” as if he's saying “Barack-ra-see.” Maybe I'm just hearing that. Or maybe we just created a new GOP meme.

    Jindal sat with Teahen and Northey (their official portfolios outranking the political titles for the day). The mayor was next table over.

    Bob Vander Plaats, 2006 lieutenant governor candidate, got to intro Jindal; are we SURE this wasn't a campaign event? And is it Campaign 2012 or Campaign 2010? Both, I suspect; Vander Plaats has been high-profile since Nov. 4 with a “stick to your values, social conservatives” piece in the Register as the GOP regroups.

    BVP talks at length about “character” in flood recovery. “We saw a whole different type of leadership (in Louisiana) because of character.” (Again, the implied Blanco dis).

    After thanking Iowans for post-Katrina help Jindal compares notes: “People matter more than regulations and red tape.” (applause) “It's better to have to ask for forgiveness than permission, especially when you're dealing with the federal bureaucracy. You can always write an apology to the bureaucrats later.” He tells a story about bureaucrats looking for proof of insurance mid-hurricane. “You tell FEMA what you need, don't wait for the government to tell you what to do.”

    Louisiana has had more colorful governors per capita than any state in the union. This man is filling the seat of the larger than life Longs, country singer Jimmie “You Are My Sunshine” Davis, and kleptocrat Edwin Edwards, after all. And Jindal, too, is a unique character: a young man in a hurry, governor at 37, and the nation's first Indian-American governor.

    The story I remember is that Jindal, who was given a more traditional Indian name at birth, came home from kindergarten and told his parents that from now on his name was Bobby. He's a classic red white and blue first generation American. Jindal looks like he's the guy on the other end of the tech support line in Bangalore, but the voice is pure gumbo as “Saint Bernard Parish” and the occasional “y'all” drawls out of his mouth. “I was born and raised in my home state of Louisiana,” he says with pride.

    “You need to see it through to the end, and the end is long after the national press had moved on,” Jindal says of disaster recovery.

    “The faith community was critical to our recovery, we need to help them do their good work.” Lots of examples of private sector help at emergency time, bracketed by comments on how much more effective that was that government help. We heard “Lemme give ya three or four examples” a lot, and the talk was anecdote-heavy. Bobby is a storyteller, swift-paced and extemporaneous.

    “I'm not here to beat up on the federal government,” Jindal disclaimed, yet that seems to be a theme. If this run does happen, look for a template something like this speech. “You've got to be ready to partner with the private sector and the faith based groups.”

    Best line: “You really think people would volunteer to eat an MRE instead of the food we have in South Louisiana?” As chef Justin Wilson would say, I ga-ron-tee we'll see more of Jindal in Iowa.

    Update: Douglas Burns at Iowa Political Alert caught the West Des Moines event.

    20 Kasım 2008 Perşembe

    Advice for Republicans

    Advice for Republicans

    The 2012 Republican caucuses begin today with Mike Huckabee's Iowa visit, as Republicans continue the navel-gazing that inevitably comes with a loss. (Been there, done that.)

    I know I'm probably the last guy who should offer the GOP advice. But consider this week's must read, Kathleen Parker's Washington Post piece provocatively headlined "Giving Up on God." No, not existential angst; political angst.
    "Simply put: Armband religion is killing the Republican Party. And, the truth -- as long as we're setting ourselves free -- is that if one were to eavesdrop on private conversations among the party intelligentsia, one would hear precisely that."


    Marc Ambinder analyzes: "There are two secrets, actually: one -- that the 'leaders' of the various movements within social conservatism are ill-adapted to modern politics and can exacerbate tensions between the movement and outsiders; and two--that a large part of the Republican establishment believes they can pander to these voters, not address their core concerns, and still rely on them for support."

    Social conservatives are at once the GOP's greatest strength and greatest weakness. I'm not telling Republicans to abandon the social issues; that's not my place. And frankly I have a bias in wanting to win those issues and get them off the table.

    As a member of the left end base of the Democratic Party, frankly, I expect to get screwed one in a while. Defunding the war, impeachment, gay marriage, Lieberman--that's an incomplete list from just this year.

    In the process of endless disappointment, we've learned to choose our battles. And that's all I'm recommending: choose your battles.

    On some of the social issues, conservatives are popular. Stop freaking out, Barack's not taking your gun away. You won that fight. Faith-based programs have some appeal. The school voucher fight is still a live one. (Just analyzing here, not agreeing.)

    But other social issues which were winners in the 1968-2008 divide and conquer alignment of Nixon and Wallace and Atwater and Rove are losers in the long run.

    Gay marriage is a generational conflict. People who came of came of age before Stonewall, when homosexuality was literally classified as a mental illness, simply didn't talk about it. That age cohort drives the slim majority that voted yes on Proposition 8--and they won't be voting in many more elections. I know the religious right sees that, and it's behind the effort to cement marriage bans into constitutions before their voters die off.

    Yes, a lot of people are deeply conflicted about the morality of abortion and don't like it. But you know what they like even less? The government telling them what to do. That's a conservative impulse if anything.

    And some of the niche issues of the religious right are active vote-killers now. Issues like opposition to stem cell research and the Terry Schaivo circus scare middle of the roaders away. And denial of evolution makes us look like a joke to the rest of the world. Why is Darwinism good economics but bad science?

    Finally, when priests start denying people communion because they voted for Obama? That's reeeeally scary. I know it's the church doing that and not the political system, but people see it as part of the same subculture.

    I don't know the Christian conservative subculture. I know OF it; sometimes I see its channels as I flip through the cable, sometimes I see incongruous ads featuring "stars" I've never heard of. I've even been trained to recognize some of the dog whistles.

    What I do know is numbers, and I pity the Republican dilemma. The social conservative subculture is probably 25 or 30 percent of the country. In a winner take all electoral system, with its bipolar bias toward two parties, that's enough to control a party.

    But it's not enough to win.

    The Republican philosophy of self-reliance and personal freedom has deep roots in American history, as does the Democratic philosophy of "I am my brother's keeper." Libertarians, like social conservatives, are quick to leap to issues that they deeply care about but which don't have mass appeal. Ron Paul was a flawed candidate, whose message was popular in spite of himself.

    But the Jeffersonian argument that government is best which governs least? A party that advocates consistent freedom in matters economic and personal? That's a Republican party I'd like to engage in a dialogue.

    6 Kasım 2008 Perşembe

    Nussle for RNC chair?

    Nussle for RNC chair?

    Could Jim Nussle do for the Republican National Committee what he couldn't do as a candidate for governor--lead his party to victory?

    Chris Cilizza of the Washington Post makes a case for placing the White House budget director and former Iowa congressman on the short list of possible candidates to chair the RNC as the party rebuilds from John McCain's defeat and the loss of House and Senate seats in Tuesday's election.

    "Iowa -- and the Midwest generally -- is a central political battleground in 2010 and beyond, Cilizza writes as an argument for Nussle. But he continues: "Nussle is abrasive (at times) and has made a fair number of enemies during his political career."

    "Initially considered one of the party's strongest candidates nationwide," in his 2006 race for governor, Cilizza writes, "Nussle's campaign underperformed."

    (Special note to my Republican readers: I'm reeeally interested in your comments.)

    4 Haziran 2008 Çarşamba

    Miller-Meeks in Squeaker over Teahen

    Miller-Meeks in Squeaker over Teahen

    In a race marked by open loathing of Peter Teahen by Iowa's conservative bloggers, Mariannette Miller-Meeks overcame a big Teahen margin in Linn County to claim a 109 vote win in the 2nd Congressional District. The Ottumwa doctor will now challenge first-term Democrat Dave Loebsack in the fall.

    So did Miller-Meeks win, or did Peter Teahen lose? A little of each, perhaps.

    Teahen started the race as a perceived front runner, but he didn't sit well with the conservative base. Opposition research is easy in the Internet era, and a little quick searching turned up a December 2007 party affiliation change from Democratic to Republican. Most damning were campaign contributions to Democrats Mike Blouin and 2002 congressional candidate Julie Thomas.

    Teahen offered an unapologetic defense of the Thomas donation, saying the pediatrician had saved his daughter's life. But it left a bad taste with conservatives, who repeatedly emphasized the donation and party changes on their blogs. It didn't stop there. Shortly before the election, an email from a British disaster worker surfaced, charging that Teahen acted like a diva on a Darfur mission and calling his resume into question. The charge cut to the core of Teahen's biography as a Red Cross disaster expert.

    Bloggers also attacked Teahen's family values, posting links to his divorce papers. Democrats joined the attack as well, filing complaints about ads for Teahen's funeral home that (they said) too closely resembled campaign ads.

    Mariannette Miller-Meeks, meanwhile, made the most of a medical and military background. (How many M's can I cram in? Well, the campaign played on the name by handing out M&Ms as favors.) By the April congressional district convention, she seemed to have established a strong foothold among the party activists, which matters a lot in a low-turnout election.

    Her GOP bona fides were also attacked by third candidate Lee Harder, whose underfunded campaign that emphasized the social issues never gained much traction. Harder's signs proclaimed "Vote Conservative," while Teahen and Miller-Meeks both left off the word "Republican." But that appeal fell flat, as the race was treated as a two and a half way contest with a focus on "who can beat Loebsack."

    Teahen started the night in the lead, as returns from his base in Linn County rolled in early. He won a big margin -- 67 percent to 26 percent -- over Miller-Meeks in Linn, where turnout was high due to hot courthouse primaries. It was almost, but not quite, enough. Over half of Teahen's total vote came out of Linn, which is the 2nd District's largest county but doesn't dominate the way Polk County controls a majority of the 3rd District.

    Teahen's base in Linn was considered a strength early in the campaign, as he argued that a candidate from the northern end of the district would run stronger in Linn and Johnson counties against the Mt. Vernon-based Loebsack. But Miller-Meeks turned the argument against Teahen, arguing that he was raising money exclusively from Linn County and not campaigning enough in the rest of the district.

    As returns rolled in from the rest of the district, Miller-Meeks caught up and took a narrow lead. County by county, she picked up wins of several dozen or a couple hundred in low turnout, whittling away at Teahen's 2,500 vote Linn margin. A 742-vote win in her home of Wapello County was enough to seal the deal.

    The race is not yet on the national radar. But, then, it wasn't on the national radar two years ago either.

    The 2nd District, on paper, is the most Democratic in the state, and in retrospect it seems that the real fluke was not Loebsack's 2006 upset win, but rather Republican Jim Leach's ability to hold the district for 30 years. Leach was able to pull as much as a quarter of the Democratic vote, until that vote went flooding back to Loebsack in the national landslide of 2006. Miller-Meeks will need to win back some of those Democrats and independents to take this race off the "safe Democratic" list.

    13 Mayıs 2008 Salı

    1970 Republican Primary Parallels Boswell vs. Fallon

    1970 Republican Primary Parallels Boswell vs. Fallon

    The incumbent ran as an experienced, moderate congressman, attentive to his district's needs. The younger, issue-based activist challenger, coming off an unsuccessful statewide race that nevertheless raised his profile, stressed his own legislative record and said the incumbent's congressional voting record was insufficiently loyal to the party.

    Leonard Boswell and Ed Fallon? Nope. Hop in the Wayback Machine and set the dial to 1970, when Republican incumbent Fred Schwengel and challenger David Stanley faced off in Iowa's last primary challenge to a congressional incumbent -- nearly 40 years ago.

    David Stanley, 1968

    David Stanley is better known in this century for his leadership of the conservative group Iowans for Tax Relief than for his U.S House and Senate bids. Schwengel, who died in 1993, is the name behind the Mississippi River Bridge on Interstate 80. But in 1970, the two faced off in what was then numbered the 1st Congressional District.

    Schwengel won that June 1970 contest, with 56 percent to Stanley's 44 percent. Stanley carried the counties in his old legislative district, Muscatine and Louisa. The race was studied by University of Iowa political scientists Donald Johnson and James Gibson, who published an article in the March 1974 edition of the American Political Science Review that called the race a classic example of "the divisive primary."

    Like Boswell, Schwengel had only one loss on his electoral record, in a heavily partisan year. In the Republican watershed year of 1994 Boswell, then a state senator, was the lieutenant governor running mate on Bonnie Campbell's losing ticket. He came back from that loss to win his Congressional seat in 1996. Fred Schwengel, first elected to Congress in 1954 after a decade representing Davenport in the state legislature, lost his seat to Democrat John Schmidhauser in the Lyndon Johnson landslide of 1964. He then came back to beat Schmidhauser in a 1966 rematch.

    David Stanley, like Ed Fallon, raised his profile by giving up his legislative seat and losing a statewide race. In Fallon's case, it was the 2006 gubernatorial primary, where he finished third but won a surprisingly strong 26 percent, and actually won the area that makes up the 3rd Congressional District where he's running now. Stanley lost a 1968 U.S. Senate race to Harold Hughes, but came within 5,000 votes -- 1/2 of 1 percent -- of upsetting the popular sitting Democratic governor.

    Stanley's Muscatine-based legislative district, like the turf Fallon represented in inner-city Des Moines from 1993 to 2006, was safe for his party. Stanley served in the state House from 1959 to 1964 and moved to the state Senate for one term. He won that state senate race with 60% in the Democratic landslide year of 1964. With a safe seat, a candidate can take positions that excite activists who vote in primaries, rather than compiling a middle-of-the-road record that draws moderate votes in general elections.

    Fred Schwengel, 1970

    "Schwengel, 63, ran as an experienced and moderate legislator who, as a member of the Committee on Public Works, had been attentive to his constituents and their needs," wrote Johnson and Gibson. "Stanley, 42, campaigned vigorously from house to house and in frequent professionally made television announcements. He stressed his own state legislative record and invariably charged that Schwengel was insufficiently regular as a Republican -- that his party unity score was lowest among all of Iowa's congressmen."

    Stanley's charges are echoed today by Fallon, who argues that Boswell's voting record, particularly his 2002 vote to authorize the Iraq war, is too conservative for a Democrat. But in one key difference between the 1970 race and this year's contest, Boswell has hurled the party loyalty issue back at Fallon, citing his 2000 support for Green presidential candidate Ralph Nader over Democrat Al Gore.

    Another difference between the 1970 battle and this year's contest is that only one party has a primary contest in 2008. Democrats know that either Boswell or Fallon's Republican opponent in November will be former congressional staffer Kim Schmett. But in 1970, 1st District Democrats also had a spirited primary. State representative Ed Mezvinsky, an attorney and consumer advocate, prevailed over anti-Vietnam War professor William Albrecht and law-and-order sheriff William "Blackie" Strout. Mezvinsky's campaign featured distinctive ads showing voters butchering his name, that later became literally textbook examples of name-ID ads.

    Johnson and Gibson surveyed activists in both parties before the primary and again just before the November general election. They found that most established Republican activists had backed incumbent Schwengel, just as the establishment of the Democratic Party is backing Boswell this year. In their post-primary study, they found that 60 percent of the respondents who backed primary losers intended to vote split tickets in the fall, compared to only 31 percent of the activists who had backed winners Schwengel and Mezvinsky. "There was no intensive or comprehensive effort made by the winners to recruit people who had been active for the opposition in the primary," wrote Johnson and Gibson. "Only a few, possibly no more than three to five, Stanley workers volunteered to work in the Schwengel campaign; most of those who continued their political work did shift to other campaigns."

    While Schwengel prevailed over Mezvinsky in November 1970, Mezvinsky came back and finally ended Schwengel's career in 1972. Schwengel went on to serve as U.S. Capitol historian.

    Before founding Iowans for Tax Relief in 1978, Stanley returned to the state House for one term in 1972, and lost another close U.S. Senate race, this time to John Culver, in 1974.

    19 Nisan 2008 Cumartesi

    King Rallies Troops In 2nd District

    King Rallies Troops In 2nd District

    “Nobody wonders where I stand,” Congressman Steve King told 2nd Congressional District Republicans Saturday, making a detour out of his own 5th District to rally the eastern Iowa GOP troops at their district convention in Iowa City.

    In a brief Iowa Independent interview, King stood behind the rhetorical style that’s earned him scorn from liberals and Worst Person In The World “honors” from the media, but solid support from Republican activists.

    “I just tell the truth, and I’m waiting for somebody to stand up and say ‘I have a different number, I have a different statistic,’” he said. “But they don’t. They just want to call names. So when you get to that point you’ve already won the debate.”

    King, whose high profile endorsement of Fred Thompson failed to give the former Tennessee senator much traction in the January caucuses, now says he’s fully behind the party’s certain nominee, John McCain. “There are some folks who have a ways to go yet, but it’s coming, because they understand the rationale,” he told Iowa Independent.

    “With John McCain we can rebuild the Reagan coalition and become a governing coalition again,” he told delegates.

    King strongly defended McCain’s position on the Iraq war and attacked the Democrats. “You cannot tell people you support the troops if you do not support their mission there,” he said. “Those things are linked together.

    Iowa Republican Party chair Stewart Iverson echoed King’s thoughts on the war. “We all want to see this brought to and end as quickly as possible,” Iverson told delegates. “The difference is, we want to win.”

    Supreme Court appointments are one of the critical issues to Republican activists, and King told delegates the next president may appoint two to four justices that may be able to overturn Roe v. Wade. “Ruth Bader Ginsburg will be the model for Obama or Hillary,” he said. “Many of us have worked a lifetime to get here, and if we go backward in this presidential race, we can write this off for my lifetime.”

    Despite his support for McCain, King still acknowledged some disappointment that “we aren’t going to elect a president who supports the Fair Tax.” The flat, consumption based tax was a centerpiece of the Mike Huckabee campaign, and support from the Fair Tax group was credited with helping Huckabee to the second-place finish in the August 2007 straw poll that started him on the road to his caucus victory.

    Next weekend’s Democratic conventions are likely to draw heavy attention from state and even national media. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama delegates, and some John Edwards diehards, will face off to elect the state’s first actual national delegates. But Republicans don’t elect national delegates until June, their nomination fight is settled, and the press table was pretty lonely except for the Cedar Rapids Gazette’s James Lynch and myself.

    The speeches by King and other party leaders were the highlight of a convention otherwise taken up by election of party officers and platform debate. “I’ll be happy as long as someone throws in eminent domain and property rights” in the platform, said state representative Jeff Kaufmann of Wilton, who has focused on the issue during his two House terms. While he didn’t endorse anyone during the caucuses, Kaufmann says he’s firmly behind McCain. “In my heart, I think he’s the only candidate who gives us a chance and reaches out to independents,” he said.

    One of those independents is Hani Elkadi of Iowa City. Elkadi used to be active in the Democrats, but left the party “because of Bill Clinton, to be honest.” He said he is still undecided about many state and federal races, but “that’s the best thing about being an independent.”

    One new face at the GOP convention was Clyde Cleveland of Fairfield, the 2002 Libertarian candidate for governor. Cleveland moved to the GOP to support Ron Paul. “We have to turn this country around now,” he said. “We don’t have time to build a third party.”

    Cleveland is less than pleased with McCain. “He has an F minus with gun owners. It’s hard for a Goldwater Republican like me, who grew up a constitutionalist, to support him. Is he a lesser of three evils? Sure,” Cleveland said, comparing McCain to Obama and Clinton. “We just have to do the best we can do now.”

    Other former supporters of other Republicans are more positive. “I’ve got real hope for McCain,” said state senator Jim Hahn of Muscatine, who was an early Mitt Romney supporter. “He’s got some good attributes.”

    Red Watson of Fairfield echoed the sentiment that McCain was the best of the three remaining major candidates, but was more enthusiastic than Cleveland. “McCain believes that life begins at conception,” he said.

    Congressional candidate Lee Harder said he is hopeful that McCain “may be more conservative as a president than he was as a senator.”

    Secretary of Agriculture Bill Northey acknowledged 2006 was a tough year for Iowa Republicans in his speech. Northey himself was one of the party’s few bright spots; he took over the agriculture job while his party lost the state house and senate and two congressional seats. “This is built one election at a time,” he said.

    As a former state legislator, King says he still keeps a close eye on state issues. He said the Democratic trifecta of governor, house and senate has given Republicans “banner issues for our statehouse candidates to run on,” singling out Renee Schulte of Cedar Rapids, who is running against Democratic freshman Art Staed.

    Linn County Republican chair Jim Conklin said, “the party is still growing, though not as fast as I want.” He said the party is coming together after the caucus season, unlike the other party.

    “I hope Hillary and Obama keep helping McCain get elected,” he said.




    Aside: Steve King’s one-liner when faced with a liberal blogger in a raspberry beret was fully in character: “If I need somebody to go get me a bottle of French wine, can you do that?” My response, of course: “Oui, oui.”

    8 Mart 2007 Perşembe

    Ex-GOP candidates turn attacks back on national panel - The Boston Globe

    Ex-GOP candidates turn attacks back on national panel

    The Boston Globe (free reg req) looks at "independent" party expenditures and we see a blast from Iowa's recent past:
    Four months after Republicans lost control of Congress, many of their former candidates are calling for major changes at the NRCC. They depict the committee as a rogue attack-ad shop that shielded party leaders from having to account for the claims in their ads -- encouraging over-the-top accusations that often hurt GOP candidates.

    In Iowa, an NRCC ad suggested that Democrat Bruce Braley was backed by the Communist Party, citing the fact that a party newspaper labeled Braley a "peace candidate." Republican candidate Mike Whalen said he immediately called friends in Washington to pressure the NRCC to take the ad down, but was told that nothing could be done because it was a product of the independent expenditure arm.

    "I went ballistic, desperately trying to send the message through back channels," Whalen said. "They didn't care. They said, 'We don't have any control over it.' . . . That ad in particular I think sullied my reputation, and I will always resent that ad."

    2 Mart 2007 Cuma

    Tancredo's The One To Watch

    Tancredo's The One To Watch

    Sorry, Gov. Richardson, but the weather looked nasty. Catch you next time, and link love later for those who are there.

    Meanwhile, I'm looking at the right side of things. (Aside: Anybody want me to cover a GOP event, just to capture my take on the look and feel of the thing?) Iowa Voice bemoans the current GOP field and laments my Theory Of The Turn:

    We’ve got to end this nonsense of putting someone up there simply because we think they’ve ‘earned it’ (Bob Dole) or because we think he can win, and instead nominate the best conservative we can find for the job.

    If you want to know why McCain and Rudy are high in the polls right now, it’s because they’ve got the name recognition going for them. It’s not because they’re conservatives, because we know they’re not.


    Well, too conservative for me, but we are talking GOP standards here. Iowa Voice then goes on to cite GOPProgress.com who was at some big conservative get together:

    Team Tancredo seems to be sporting, with 0% deviation, 'no smoking' style stickers, with 'Rudy McRomney' emblazoned on the backdrop. In other words, there's a concerted group of anti-moderates on the ground. But, interestingly, most of them aren't focused on the Big Three, or Rudy Giuliani, or even McCain. Most are focused on Romney.

    The evidence for this? The appearance of Mitt Flops-- quite literally, flip-flops in four different colors, pointing out Romney's wild changes of position on everything from taxes, to guns, to political parties, which seem to be in the hands of every Tancredo-ite in sight, but which during the course of the day made their way into the hands of many, if not most, attendees.


    This confirms two of my pet theories:

  • Mitt Romney is a crash and burn waiting to happen
  • and Tom Tancredo is the winger candidate who is going to come out of nowhere and shock everyone.
  • 21 Şubat 2007 Çarşamba

    Republicans Don't Want You To Vote: Papers, Please

    Republicans Don't Want You To Vote: Papers, Please

    Here's why the GOP is so obsessed with ID requirements:
    States that imposed identification requirements on voters reduced turnout at the polls in the 2004 presidential election by about 3 percent, and by two to three times as much for minorities, new research suggests.

    The study, prepared by scholars at Rutgers and Ohio State Universities for the federal Election Assistance Commission, supports concerns among voting-rights advocates that blacks and Hispanics could be disproportionately affected by ID requirements.

    Tim Vercellotti, a professor at the Eagleton Institute of Politics at Rutgers University who helped conduct the study, said that in the states where voters were required to sign their names or present identifying documents like utility bills, blacks were 5.7 percent less likely to vote than in states where voters simply had to say their names.

    Dr. Vercellotti said Hispanics appeared to be 10 percent less likely to vote under those requirements, while the combined rate for people of all races was 2.7 percent.


    Way more important than voting on pieces of dead tree.




    Dodd in Iowa City here and here and here.

    Obama in Des Moines tonight
    . He's also speaking to a meeting of Democratic legislators.

    17 Şubat 2007 Cumartesi

    Republican Idiocy and Futility Two-Fer

    Republican Idiocy and Futility Two-Fer

    Federal Edition: Krazy King kontinues his obsession with the way people talk.

    A drive to make English the nation's official language once again has kicked off in Congress, spearheaded by Republican Rep. Steve King of Iowa.

    "Language is the bonding agent. It's the glue that holds us together."

    The English-language bill draws intense opposition from groups that advocate on behalf of immigrants, who contend that English is not under attack and that a law is unneeded. What's necessary, they say, is more federal support for overcrowded adult education classes teaching English to immigrants.

    Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Ia., has expressed hesitation about an English-language law.


    State Edition: Not satisfied with opposing Fair Share, Mary Lundby and the Senate GOP wants to actively insult labor.

    They’ve introduced a bill to declare May 1 as Iowa’s Right To Work Day to remember the passage of Iowa’s anti-labor “Right To Work” Act.


    Hat tip to Iowa Progress on this. May Day is Labour Day in most civilized countries of the world.

    News bulletin, Republicans: You lost the last election. Actively insulting new Americans and working people may shore up your shrinking base, but it's no way to work your way to a majority. Divide no longer means conquer.

    Profiles In Contrast

    Profiles In Contrast


  • "This is a rare Saturday vote. We’ve had only a handful of votes on Saturdays in the last 20 years. Even though I had to cancel a couple of speeches in Iowa, this is the place to be because the War on Terrorism is the most important issue facing Americans"
    -Chuck Grassley, speaking today in Washington DC

  • John McCain in Des Moines today blasted the Democrat-controlled Senate leadership for calling a Saturday session to debate a "meaningless resolution" of disapproval for President Bush's Iraq war strategy.

    "It's insulting to the public and our soldiers to pretend we're discharging our responsibility in any meaningful way."

    Thanks to O. Kay for pointing this out and pushing the objectivity envelope.

    Vote was 56-34, but needed 60. Ten absent, including McCain. Washington Post adds to his sense of false priorities (i.e. me, me me):

    Most Democrats were already seated at their desks when the roll call began shortly before 2 p.m. The only Democrat who missed the vote was Sen. Tim Johnson (S.D.), who is recovering from brain surgery. Democratic Sens. Robert P. Casey Jr. (Pa.) and Max Baucus (Mont.) canceled plans to visit Iraq this weekend and were present on the floor. Their traveling companions, GOP Sens. Jon Kyl (Ariz.) and Bob Corker (Tenn.), went ahead with the trip and missed the Senate action.


    All actual Democrats voted to stop the surge - Joementum, of course, showed his true colors and voted like a Republican. But seven GOP senators defected from the Bush line:
    Norm Coleman of Minnesota, Susan Collins of Maine, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, Gordon Smith of Oregon, Olympia Snowe of Maine, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and John Warner of Virginia. All but Snowe and Specter could face the voters in 2008.


    Norm Coleman. How will his vote affect me, Al Franken?