21 Bar Referendum etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
21 Bar Referendum etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

31 Ekim 2007 Çarşamba

Iowa City Council Candidates Consider Impact of 21 Bar Referendum

Iowa City Council Candidates Consider Impact of 21 Bar Referendum

Young people are statistically the least likely voters, especially in local elections in high-turnover college towns.  But last week, Iowa City saw a burst of presidential-level voting activity on the University of Iowa campus.  This burst of civic activism was prompted by an issue with direct impact on most students: their nightlife.

Iowa City voters are considering an ordinance that would prevent anyone under age 21 from entering bars after 10 p.m.  The question was placed on the ballot by a citizen petition allowed under Iowa City's home rule charter.  Proponents argue the ordinance would reduce underage and binge drinking, while supporters contend it would merely push partying to the less controlled house-party environment.  (Lost in the shuffle: the legislative question of whether or not a 21-year-old drinking age law is either just or workable in a college town.)

The referendum has stirred the sleeping giant of student apathy. Members of the whimsically named Student Health Initiative Taskforce (the Iowa City Press Citizen, which has endorsed a yes vote, is reluctant to print the name because of the acronym) petitioned for five satellite voting sites on campus before last Friday's voter registration deadline, and nearly 2,900 people voted on campus.  The satellite vote effort followed a vote-by-mail drive the previous week that netted about 1,800 requests.  In this world turned upside down electorate, the most likely voters to have requested absentee ballots were independents aged 18 to 24 in Iowa City Precinct 5, a downtown area made up almost entirely of dorms and fraternities.

Of course, a requested ballot isn't the same thing as a counted vote.  In 2001, bar owner Mike Porter led a similar but smaller vote-by-mail drive on behalf of city council candidate Leah Cohen, owner of bar-restaurant Bo James in downtown Iowa City. Four hundred people, mostly young, never returned their ballots, and Cohen lost by 58 votes.  This year, Cohen and Porter are leading Bloc21, the "adult" vote-no group.

Even in smaller numbers, the student vote can be decisive in city elections.  Rick Dobyns, the doctor who led the petition drive, was a council candidate in 2005 and led in the October primary.  But he lost by wide margins in student precincts in November, and even though the absolute numbers were small, they were enough to cost Dobyns the election by 194 votes.

The 21 bar issue was on the minds of the four candidates for two at-large council seats.  The candidates met Monday at a "No Baloney" forum hosted by Gary Sanders, a longtime fixture on the Iowa City political scene. It is believed that in some dictionaries, under the word "gadfly," a portrait of Sanders appears.  He hoisted an actual ring of baloney, which he threatened to use as a gavel at the debate.  Sanders is an ardent 21 bar supporter who conducted a recent Sunday morning "vomit tour" of downtown sidewalks.

Attorney Matt Hayek was an overwhelming primary winner and has drawn support from both sides of the Iowa City political spectrum, including conservative former Mayor Bill Ambrisco and progressive County Supervisor Rod Sullivan.  Hayek opposes the 21 bar referendum but acknowledges "there are good intentions on both sides."


Mike Wright, a University librarian, finished second in the primary and is seen as the progressive candidate.  Wright is a neighborhood association activist on the north side, an area of mixed student and non-student housing, and supports the 21 bar referendum citing a number of problem houses in his neighborhood.  "Part of the solution is we need to find a non-alcoholic venue for students," he said in the forum.

Terry Smith finished third in the primary.  Smith is a manager at Mid-American Energy and led the 2005 effort against a public power referendum.  Public power lost two to one but was outspent about 20 to one.  Smith opposes the bar issue and positioned himself in the forum as a defender of "adult rights," citing his 20-year-old son who is about to be shipped off to Iraq.  Smith said his son frequently goes out to bars as a designated driver.  As for underage drinkers, Smith said, "Since these people are already breaking the law, is it really going to be effective to put one more law on the books?"

Bloc21 is backing Hayek and Smith.  Hayek said the endorsement was without his consent.  "We want to be completely independent of the referendum," he said at the forum, saying he contacted Porter after the first day of early voting and asked him to remove Hayek signs from a colorfully festooned "Hawk Patrol" SUV that Porter was driving around campus.  Smith said he'd been tipped off by Hayek and had also asked Porter to remove his signs.  But as of Friday, referendum opponents were still handing out fliers on campus urging students to vote Smith and Hayek as well as no on the referendum.

Seemingly lost in the shuffle is incumbent Dee Vanderhoef, coming off a fourth-place October primary finish.  Vanderhoef is a downtown business owner and a 21 bar supporter.  "How can a non-alcoholic venue succeed without the (21 bar) law?" she asked rhetorically at the forum.  "The business plan does not work in competition with an alcohol venue."  Vanderhoef appears almost resigned to defeat.  In Monday's forum, she didn't contest claims that the "real race" is between Smith and Wright, and said she was hearing concerns from voters that her 12 years on the council is long enough.

After the petition was submitted, under Iowa City's charter the city council had the option of either passing the 21 bar ordinance outright or placing the issue on the ballot.  "I personally support the ordinance, but it's time for the citizens to speak," Vanderhoef said.  She contends there was a council majority for 21 bars from 1999 to 2003, but passage was prevented because one member wanted to use the bar age as a bargaining chip on other issues.

With the unprecedented student turnout, referendum supporters will need overwhelming "townie" support to succeed, and absentee voting rates show no signs of a corresponding backlash vote.  At Monday's forum, Sanders asked if students should even be voting in a local election.  "It's the law; we have to let them," said Vanderhoef.  "Democracy isn't always perfect," said Wright, earning himself a whap from the ring of baloney.

27 Mart 2007 Salı

Neo-Prohibitionists Getting The Names

Neo-Prohibitionists Getting The Names



The 21 bar folks continue toward the ballot - or do they?

“Our hope is to get a significantly more than what is necessary as a way to speak to the city and City Council of the importance of this issue,” Martin said.


So is the goal a referendum, or - and this is an option under the city charter - to get passage of 21 bars aftr the petition succeeds and keep it off the ballot?

Here's hoping the council lets it go to the ballot. Biggest. Student. Turnout. Ever.

7 Mart 2007 Çarşamba

21 Bars Get Busy

21 Bars Get Busy



Not as high profile as the Obama meeting but the committee for the 21 bar referendum got together last night. Only the Daily Iowan picks up on it - is that what we can expect for the fall? - but they did get Leah Cohen to call them "prohibitionists." Iowa City locals will recall that Cohen, owner of Bo James, fell about 50 votes short of bumping off Mike O'Donnell in 2001. Mike later switched to anti-21, which helped him beat 21 bar leader Rick Dobyns in `05 after Dobyns placd first in the primary.




Quick links:

  • Edwards picks up some Vilsackers; the few big names from Johnson and Linn don't appear. Essential Estrogen says this is bad for the caucuses; I see the point but mildly disagree. I think the county chair types can be fair even if committed; we're not talking Chicago Alderman Louie Kneecaps here.
  • The Dems have finally found the phrase that pays: "Fully Funded Withdrawal." Some Progressive Caucus names here; will watch this one closely.
  • Interesting national numbers on immigration: Support for letting folks stay in the US and get on a citizenship path has stayed roughly steady in the 60% range but there's a recent spike in the GOP base, unworkable "deport everyone" position. Jonathan Singer at MyDD:

    No doubt those speaking out in opposition to creating a realistic fix to the problem of having 10 million or more people living inside our country's borders unlawfully are among the loudest -- or at the least know how to play to the media to offer the portrayal that their numbers are greater than they actually are. And in fact, many in Congress -- to many Democrats, included -- have become timid on the issue of immigration reform as a result.

    But the numbers speak for themselves. Americans want a comprehensive reform of the nation's immigration policy -- one that includes a path to citizenship.


    It's the classic strength of position curve that drives so many of our issues: the vast majority that support a citizensip path do so mildly, while the minority have anger and energy on their side. See gun control, stem cells, choice, etc. for more examples. And get ready for that Tom Tancredo surprise.
  • 5 Mart 2007 Pazartesi

    Funnel Week

    Funnel Week

    Not to be confused with funnel cake week which is in August at the State Fair. Do or die time for legislation.

    Bills that would bring back TouchPlay machines and scrap Iowa's official English law appear headed for the Legislature's discard pile.

    Proposals to require beer keg registration, create a statewide preschool program and allow cities to ban public smoking remain in the tall stack of bills that legislators plan to tackle during the second half of the 2007 session.

    Legislation championed by organized labor and strongly opposed by business groups - allowing the collection of fees from nonunion workers for services provided by unions - remains a wild card.


    You all know the words: I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...




    Nate covers HRC in DBQ for MyDD.

    This week's email from Supervisor Rod Sullivan is highly quotable on Rick Dobyns' 21-bar referendum:
    Regardless of how you feel on the issue, we all owe these two men a debt of gratitude. They are providing political cover for every council candidate. Now, every candidate, no matter how she feels, can simply say, "I will respect the results of the referendum."

    I, for one, am tired of the dishonesty. I am tired of students not telling the whole truth. I am tired of bar owners not telling the whole truth. I am tired of Bud & Miller not telling the whole truth. Perhaps a public vote will put the issue to bed once and for all. Yes, we will get a huge student turnout. That is fine. Students have a right to vote.

    Personally, I think the solutions to these problems require some huge cultural shifts. But the first step is honesty on all sides. We have not gotten that yet.

    9 Şubat 2007 Cuma

    21 Bars on November IC ballot?

    21 bars on November IC ballot?

    Failed city council candidate Rick Dobyns wants to put the 21 bar admission issue on the ballot this fall. This should give me good material for several months of rants.

    Rick, Rick, Rick. Haven't you learned? Didn't you look at the numbers and your overwhelming defeat in the student precincts? Didn't you see the student liaison to the city council at Mike O'Donnell's victory party? We don't know if you're running again, but 21 bars cost you the seat on the council. And now you're doing the one thing that will guarantee a high student turnout this fall. Young candidates: this year is your opportunity. At least one at-large seat is likely to be open as Bob Elliott is pretty openly acknowledging he won't run. And Dee Vanderhoef, up for re-election, is solidly pro-21.

    There's almost no honesty from anyone on this issue.

  • Political figures: Please say publicly what you admit privately, and what reasonable folks know: the 21 year old drinking age is an ineffective and unjust law and should be scrapped. I hear 19 from a lot of folks but I prefer 18; an adult is an adult and let the schools figure it out.
  • Bar owners: Acknowledge your economic self-interest. You make a lot of money selling to those "underage" folks and that fake ID looks just fine to you in the dark.
  • Students: Come on. You don't really want to get into the bar to "dance" and "hang out with your older friends".
  • Self-proclaimed public health do-gooders: You have enough advanced degrees between you to know that age and alcoholism, use and abuse, are different questions. Some 18 year olds can drink responsibly; I can't and I'm 43. And you know enough psychology to realize that the forbidden is enticing:
  • 'An Age Line!' Fred Weasley said, his eyes glinting, as they all made their way across the Hall to the doors into the Entrance Hall. 'Well, that should be fooled by an Aging Potion, shouldn't it?
    (Harry Potter and the Goblet of Two For One Mixed Drinks at Happy Hour, p. 3462)
    Barring young adults from the bars will just lead to bigger and badder house parties and new advances in fake ID technology.

    Yet I wish the good doctor good luck in his petition drive, as I think the result will be the opposite of his intent.

    10 Ekim 2006 Salı

    Priorities and the Neo-Prohibitionists

    Priorities and the Neo-Prohibitionists

    Iowa City City Council (I I love love that that double double word word there there) meets and lists legislative priorities:

  • Advocating for increased funding for the Iowa State Housing Trust Fund to make affordable housing more available.

  • Maintaining control over local cable franchise to better endorse public television.

  • Giving city government the power to increase its hotel/motel tax.

  • Eliminating the tax break for licenses on pickup trucks that originally was intended to benefit farmers.

  • Allowing home rule so local governments can determine their own public smoking regulation.

  • Putting the same commercial property tax credits on condominiums as there are on apartments.

  • Allowing cities to charge a percentage of gross revenue as part of franchise fee agreements with companies.

  • Protecting tenants from wrongful retention of landlord deposit money.


  • An interesting and not necessarily bad list. But they leave off an issue I'd include: a realistic and enforceable drinking age law.

    Time and again I've raised this in private with elected officials, and time and again they privately admit that a 21 year old drinking age is an unenforceable law. But, in pandering to the neo-prohibitionists, no one will admit it in public.

    In a separate meeting yesterday, "a group of community leaders studying the problem of excessive underage (sic) drinking" came up with its own priority list:

  • Implementing ordinances countywide restricting bar access to those over 21 years old.

  • Public and private sector cooperation in developing nonalcoholic venues appealing to young people.

  • Intensifying education efforts of parents, high school and college students.

  • The university must continue to play a leading role to educate students on excessive drinking and work with community to develop nonalcoholic venues.

  • Changing the way bars and restaurants are taxed and insured to be based on alcohol sales volume instead of revenue to discourage low pricing.

  • Implementing mandatory server training and make it harder for servers who violate existing laws to get rehired.

  • Enforcing laws that prohibit people from turning their apartments into unlicensed bars, which encourages alcohol abuse


  • There's an artificial connection here that "underage" drinking is "problem" drinking and that changing the age somehow changes the problem. The nonalcohol alternatives simply won't work without broader cultural changes that are beyond the scope of local government. The entire societal message of culture and media is that having a drink equals adulthood, and even the national government can't change that without disturbing restrictions on free speech. And without that broader change, young people will continue to see the "alternatives" as a joke.

    For me it's also the principle of the thing: if you're an adult, you're an adult. If that's 21, then change the Constitution, take away their votes, and stop enlisting them for George Bush's war. If that's 18, give `em a beer. But draw one age line, not two.

    And to my elected friends: be consistent. Stop telling me one thing in private and saying another in public. I offer a rusty old college speech trophy to the first local elected official who publicly endorses an 18 drinking age... OK, that's a rotten incentive. But I'm sure the value is below the $2.99 gift limit...

    Tell the federal government to hell with the highway money, or if you really WANT a 21 year old drinking age, send that money to Iowa City to pay for a cop on every corner and six in every bar because that's what it would take to enforce it. Me, personally? I don't want to live like that. It's not worth an intrusive level of law enforcement to make the college sophomores Be Good. How much of the alleged "need" for a new jail is based on the 21 drinking age? Talk to me about a jail when the PAULA arrests of 19 and 20 year old ADULTS stop.

    12 Kasım 2005 Cumartesi

    I.C. panel rejects 21-only bar ordinance

    I.C. panel rejects 21-only bar ordinance



    The no-21 crowd (I count myself among that) is on the offensive after defeating Rick Dobyns. From behind the Gazette moneywall:



    A downtown bar owners’ group has released a laundry list of initiatives to reduce problem drinking in Iowa City but maintains that a 21-only ordinance would be unrealistic.



    ‘‘I don’t believe there’s support for that in the city; I don’t believe we’d have the support of the City Council,’’ said Leah Cohen, co-chairwoman of the Iowa City Alcohol Advisory Board, about enacting a law prohibiting anyone under the age of 21 from entering Iowa City bars.



    ‘‘In lieu of that, we need to look at what we can do,’’ said Cohen, who owns Bo-James, 118 E. Washington St.



    Many of the proposals sent to the City Council and University of Iowa President David Skorton this week aren’t new. Included are calls for increased police bar checks, more training of bar staff, increased alcohol education for university students, promotion of non-alcohol events for young people and reduced advertising of drink specials.



    The board, though, is recommending such potentially controversial ideas as taxes on bars and/or downtown businesses that are open past 11 p.m. and the legal identification of problem bars deserving of increased police attention.



    Rejected were calls for new limits on beer kegs — it would drive people to hard liquor, the thinking goes — and inflexible zoning regulations to limit the number of downtown bars.



    The recommendations come one year after the creation of the 10-member advisory board and will likely face their first consideration with a newly elected City Council.

    Currently a 4-3 council majority is opposed to a 21-only ordinance.



    Cohen is to speak briefly about the recommendations during the Tuesday night council meeting at City Hall.




    Still, no one is mentioning my approach: lobbying the legislature for a change in the drinking age.