17 Ekim 2007 Çarşamba

Caucus Date: Nevada Back on Jan. 19

Caucus Date: Nevada Back on Jan. 19

Nevada blog My Silver State reports:


The Nevada Democratic Party says it will keep its spot in the national presidential nominating calendar and maintain its caucus on Jan. 19.


The decision not to move the caucus up a week came in conjunction with a decision by South Carolina Democrats to move their primary date only three days earlier to Jan. 26 to maintain their place in the process.


Nevada party chair Jill Derby says the decision keeps Nevada as "the first test of the Western vote, the Hispanic vote and the labor vote."


Derby also called on leadoff state Iowa and New Hampshire to preserve their order in the nominating calendar as set out by the national party.


Earlier reports had said Nevada was looking at Jan. 12.


In other developments the day after the Iowa GOP set Jan. 3 as its date:

  • New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner repeated his oft-made statement to the Manchester Union-Leader that December is a possibility:

    He would prefer to schedule the primary for early January, "but something might happen that may change the circumstances, and under those circumstances, if (holding the primary in December) is the best thing for us to do, it's the thing we'll have to do."


  • Is December overplaying New Hampshire's hand?  Roger Simon at The Politico argues that in that case, going second mght be best for Iowa:

    The DNC forbids states from holding 2008 nominating contests in 2007 and could, therefore, declare New Hampshire a "rogue" state and strip it of its delegates to the nominating convention. This would leave Iowa as the first "legal" contest in the nation.


  • The national press grumbles.  MSNBC's First Take:

    The fact that we're potentially inside of 80 days before voting begins and the candidates don't know EXACTLY when the various election days are seems beyond ridiculous.  Imagine if Major League Baseball -- as of right now -- had not yet decided whether the World Series would be a best-of-seven or a best-of-nine series. It's that bizarre in this thing we call our presidential nominating process.


    And Dan Balz at the Washington Post:


    The reality is that voters in Iowa and New Hampshire have earned their privileged position by their seriousness and diligence in screening the candidates. In no other state is this tradition so richly embedded.


    But both states have become extraordinarily demanding in this cycle. They led the effort to force Democratic candidates to pledge not to campaign in Michigan and Florida -- two renegade states whose moves to schedule their primaries in January have helped to trigger the current mess. Their expectations for candidate time and respect seem almost without limit.


    Balz does offer brief praise to Gov. Chet Culver for his "no December" statement.


  • Almost as soon as the Republican State Central Committee voted Tuesday night, David Yepsen was on line with another post calling for Republicans and Democrats to caucus on separate dates.
  • 16 Ekim 2007 Salı

    Caucus Date: Iowa Democrats May Not Get Free Rein

    Caucus Date: Iowa Democrats May Not Get Free Rein

    Officially, the Iowa Democratic caucus date is set by the Iowa Democratic Party.  But this year, outside forces -- escalating leapfrog attacks from jealous states, stricter national party rules, a governor who committed early to a January date and the determination of Iowa Republicans to move forward -- may limit the moves of Iowa Democrats.

    The most obvious outside force is the vote Tuesday by Iowa Republicans to act alone and set a Thursday, Jan. 3 date, before New Hampshire has settled on its primary date.  Republicans are saying they're still working with Democrats, but the nature of that cooperation is reminiscent of George Bush vetoing a troop deadline bill.  As state party co-chair Leon Mosley told Iowa Independent at a John McCain appearance last week, "If (the Democrats) work with us, it'll be the 3rd."

    Democrats could still settle on Saturday, Jan. 5, and break the tradition dating back to 1976 of the two parties caucusing simultaneously.  That's a very bad idea, University of Iowa political science professor David Redlawsk told Iowa Independent.  "Never mind the possibilities of mischief as some Republicans go to the Democratic caucuses and vice versa, there is likely to be confusion among Iowans, and ridicule from the press, who really won't like the need to gear up twice in Des Moines for results," he said.  From a more partisan outlook, Redlawsk noted, "if the Democrats go second, the Republicans steal the thunder."

    Tuesday's developments in South Carolina indicate that the Democratic National Committee, which protected Iowa's first in the nation status in July 2006, may want to have its say, too.

    Last month, the Atlantic's Marc Arbinder reported that the presidential campaigns were on the same page and assuming the following "consensus calendar":
    Jan. 5:  Iowa caucuses (both parties, moved from Jan. 14)

    Jan. 8:  New Hampshire primary (both parties, moved from Jan. 22)

    Jan. 12:  Nevada caucuses (both parties, moved from Jan. 19)

    Jan. 15  Michigan GOP primary; Dem beauty contest (moved from Feb. 5)

    Jan. 19:  South Carolina primary (both parties, Dems moved from Jan. 29)

    Jan. 29:  Florida GOP primary; Dem beauty contest (moved from Feb. 5)

    Feb. 5: Tsunami Tuesday

    But Tuesday, South Carolina Democrats said they were now looking at Saturday, Jan. 26 -- three days earlier than the official, torn to tatters schedule, but a week later than expected.
    State party chairwoman Carol Fowler said at a meeting that a proposal to schedule the primary even earlier, on Jan. 19, the same day the state's Republicans vote, would likely be denied because DNC Chairman Howard Dean opposes it.

    Dean's support of Jan. 26 for South Carolina, while the state's GOP votes on Jan. 19, shows that the chair is not automatically against separate dates for the two parties.

    Dean's opposition to South Carolina's original plan may simply be a matter of trying to exert some control over the process.  The DNC's big stick -- stripping the delegates from calendar-violating states -- is a laughingstock.  Once there's a nominee, the national committee is a sideshow and the candidate is the big top, and no one believes that a nominee would unseat the delegates from key swing states like Florida and Michigan.

    But Dean could simply be managing the calendar deftly.  Jan. 26 keeps South Carolina ahead of leapfrogging Florida and closes a ten day gap that had belonged to the Sunshine State.  So Floridians may get their early date -- but have only three days of whatever level of attention a candidate-free primary can get to show for it.

    The South Carolina switch also opens Jan. 19 back up on the Democratic side.  That had been Nevada's date, but on Oct. 1 the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported on an email from the Nevada Democratic Party which said the party was looking to Jan. 12.

    However, that would put Nevada only four days after Jan. 8, a possible New Hampshire date.  In that context, and in the context of Dean's opposition to South Carolina moving up a week, it appears Nevada could be kept to the original Jan. 19 date, behind renegade Michigan on Jan. 15.

    Throughout this leapfrogging, and indeed back to the 1968-1972 era of nomination reform, Democrats have been more concerned than Republicans about process.  Even the states that are breaking the rules are pointing to... the rules.  Michigan argues that if they are going to be punished for voting on an unauthorized date, the official early states should also be punished for moving off their authorized dates. 

    "Michigan Democrats have always said that we would abide by the DNC's rules on the timing of the delegate selection primaries and caucuses as long as other states abided by them," wrote Gov. Jennifer Granholm, DNC member Debbie Dingell, and caucus enemy number one Sen. Carl Levin in a Friday letter to Dean. "That is now no longer the case."

    So with Michigan defiantly staying on the 15th, Nevada kept on the 19th, South Carolina getting half a loaf on the 26th and Florida on the 29th, only Nevada and South Carolina drop one place in the line.  Unless...

    Unless Iowa drops a place in line.

    In August, when the South Carolina GOP announced its move to Jan. 19, Iowa Gov. Chet Culver's immediate response was "we're not going in December."  That's not binding on the Iowa Democratic Party,  but it's certainly influential.  That commitment to January now redoubles with the  Republicans officially settling on Jan. 3.

    But the most mysterious oracle this side of Delphi has yet to speak.


    One person controls the date of the New Hampshire primary: New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner.  Gardner is a master at talking at great length and revealing little, and the date is the political equivalent of the Harry Potter book release last July.  You kind of figure Voldemort is eventually going to die, but you don't know when or where or how or how many hundreds of pages away the answer is, and the anticipation is maddening.

    Here's the tidbits Gardner has revealed:

  • He takes New Hampshire's "seven days before any similar contest" law seriously
  • He considers Michigan a "similar contest."  Even with half the Democrats off the ballot for now (unless Michigan forces them back on), the GOP still has a full contest.
  • The New Hampshire primary will not be later than January 8.
  • He prefers a Tuesday but another day is not impossible.
  • He will not announce the date until early November, after the candidate filing deadline.

    And most importantly:
  • He will not rule out December.

    The Iowa Republicans have played their hand, and the Iowa Democrats' hands may be tied.  Bill Gardner is the last player to lay his cards on the table in this game, and he could trump everyone.
  • Obama Seeks Packer Backers

    Obama Seeks Packer Backers

    Barack campaigns in Madison:
    Obama, ever seeking unity, also acknowledged the inherent difficulties he, as a Chicago Bears fan, may have in seeking support in Green Bay Packer country.

    "We've got some Badgers for Obama, we've got some cheeseheads for Obama. Cheeseheads for change, I like that, cheese heads for change. What a wonderful crowd. Never before has this many Packers fans cheered for a Bears fan," ABC's Sunlen Miller reports.

    Obama also remembered to compliment Packer living legend Bret (sic) Favre, noting, "I've got to give him some credit. Bret (sic) Favre is almost as old as me. But he's got more gray hair."


    Give the guy credit for sticking by his team in the heart of enemy territory, unlike candidates who try to cheer for the Yankees and Cubs -- or worse, Yankees and Red Sox -- simultaneously. But ABC, try to spell the first name of the all-time TD pass leader right.

    I would also take time to compare the relative records of Green Bay and Chicago -- except for the nature of that one Packer loss and one Bear win this year.

    At Least He Didn't Ask Tom Tancredo

    At Least He Didn't Ask Tom Tancredo

    I kid you not: Kid asks Rudy what he'd do as president if space aliens attacked. Amazingly, Rudy's answer does not include the numbers 9 or 11.



    Speaking of Tancredo, the Rockies' pennant means his announcement on what he's doing with his congressional re-elect is now delayed a couple weeks:
    Tancredo said he would tell his constituents about his plans "the day after the (Colorado) Rockies play their last game.

    The Tank also said:
    ...his campaign will be "pretty much over with" unless he can finish in the top three in either the New Hampshire or Iowa primary contests.

    Tancredo's in sixth place in the last Register poll.

    And speaking of presidential candidates seeking House re-election, the coals are growing really cold on Dennis Kucinich's home fires, reports Buckeye State Blog:
    Dennis, the menace, Kucinich had quite a quarter for fundraising. All in all, he brought home not one clean, crisp $20 spot, but two. That's right. For the third quarter Dennis Kucinich raised $40 for his re-election to Congress campaign. Looks like he put as much work into fundraising for OH-10 as he puts in for his constituents.

    BSB also says retirement rumors are in the Cleveland air.



    Seems Dennis wants to spend more time with his wife, for which one can hardly blame him... (Check the viewfinder and note how the cameraman is filming her, not him.)

    White supremacists ♥ Ron Paul.

    And a Florida reporter does the Roger And Me bit and goes to New Hampshire to try to get presidential candidates to talk to him.
    But then, at last, some Granite Staters bared their dark souls.

    "You're a rinky-dink state, and it serves Florida right," barked educator Mary Ann Reynolds, before an Obama rally in Plymouth. "The people of Florida didn't stop Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris from stealing the election in 2000. We don't forget. Maybe we ought to punish Florida more for what happened in 2000."

    15 Ekim 2007 Pazartesi

    John Edwards SEIU Endorsement - Liveblog

    John Edwards SEIU Endorsement - Liveblog


    John Edwards picked up the endorsement of the Iowa  branch of the local Service Employees International Union (SEIU) at a Monday event at University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics in Iowa City.  That much was expected, but Edwards also rolled out the endorsement of SEIU locals in several other states.  The national union did not endorse because Edwards did not reach a 60% threshold required by union rules.



    I liveblogged this over at Iowa Independent, here it is again:

    4:53 and with a little assist I'm live at the UIowa's Eckstein Medical Research Lab for the Iowa SEIU endorsement of John Edwards.


    Johnson County Supervisor Terrence Neuzil is one of Edwards' county co-chairs.  "It's huge, particularly for Johnson County," he says of the endorsement.  "It's kind of the time people are just starting to see who's most electable, and having an organization like SEIU on board will provide us with not only the tools -- the phonebanks, the robocalls -- it's the people power and it's politically experienced people who know what they're doing."


    An hour before start time, some of those purple shirted people from SEIU's Iowans for Health Care effort were prepping the place, carefully positioning EDWARDS signs and directional arrows across the maze of buildings thank make up the UI hospital campus.


    The Obama camp did its best to blunt this endorsement, rolling out the endorsements of Illinois and Indiana SEIU this afternoon.  By union rules, Illinois SEIU people cant come into Iowa to campaign for Obama against Iowa SEIU's endorsed candidate Edwrads.  yesterday at a Democratic party caucus training, a couple experienced union hands were unsure how that would work.


    We've already heard the ubiquitous Mellencamp and U2, and now we incongruously get Carly Simon singing "Loving You's The Right Thing To Do."  A sound guy doing a mic check shouts "kill the music."  Behind me, a woman discusses another candidate: "And I said to him, 'you CAN'T be for Hillary, she's not ELECTABLE.'"


    5:12.  SEIU's Sarah Swisher literally embraces a beaming Tom Carsner, another of the leading local Edwards supporters.  Also on the scene is State Rep. Art Staed of Cedar Rapids.  "John Edwards is an honest fellow who has his heart set on the right things.  He's sincerely more interested in the common people than in multinational corporations."


    Professor David Redlawsk says the endorsement helps Edwards immensely in Johnson County, "though there's also a sizable Obama contingent."  We exchange grumblings about a New York Times article than noted that Iowans, particularly those at the Johnson County Dems barbecue, don't read blogs.  "Our research shows 22 to 23% of caucus goers read blogs, which was higher than I expected," he said.  "It's still kind of a niche, but... the people who MATTER are reading blogs," he adds, trying to make me feel better.  He's more surprised that only 5% of Iowas have donated to a campaign online.


    5:25 and movement is difficult in this oblong atrium area.  Some of the guys in purple are hanging the puple and gold banner, I feel like I'm at a Minnesota Vikings game.  (Which if you know me is painful for this Wisconsin native who bleeds green and gold)  U-biquitous2 playing again, though as we are in a hospital it's not the usual bonecrushing rally levels.  The efficient Mark McCullogh of the Edwards staff informs us of the entrance direction and press avail after the speech.  A couple nurses in scrubs, but by and large the hot fashion statement is SEIU purple.


    I have to say I've never heard heard "Isn't She Lovely" by Stevie Wonder at a rally before.  The vehicles are pulling up... the efficient Mark McCullough distributes remarks.


    5:45 and the show starts with SEIU 199 president Cathy Glasson.  Notes membership of 2000 at UIHC.  "Our nation has a weak thready pulse" on health care -- Code Blue, says the nurse.  "Health care is the bread and butter issue Iowans are discussing."


    "John Edwards has made the fight for working families his own fight" while "Others tended to be more cautious and politically calculated."


    Washington/Oregon SEIU head brings their endorsement -- there's other states too but the applause drowns out the list.  Minnesota, too.  Ohio, WV, and Michigan, with 124,000 members.  This list of states is reminding me of Howard Dean - YEAH!  And then we're going to California - 656,000 members.  Almost seems like Illinois was the big holdout that may have blocked the national endorsement?


    With that Edwards walks in, grinning ear to ear, to the tune of Springsteen and "The Promised Land."  Local member Margie Caruth reads the intro.


    150 to 200 in the room, counting us press types.


    Edwards takes the mic at 5:58, perfectly timed for Live at 6.


    "These are men and women who have stood up and stood out for working people."  He sums up the endorsing states as "almost a million" members.


    "I've been in the trenches with them, and their cause is my cause."  "Working men and women providing health care should have health care themselves."


    "Our health care system does not work, and no one understands that better than the men and women behind me -- they work in it every day."  He repeats the call to cancel Congressional health care if Congress won't pass it for him.  That always goes over well in a crowd like this.


    He outlines the plan.


    Mandate universal coverage by law.  No preexisting conditions, mental health parity.  "No more job lock in America - take your health care withyou wherever you go."


    "No more collective bargaining sessions about health care, we'll get that off the table."


    "Get rid of George Bush's tax cuts" to pay for it.


    Decent working conditions for health care providers.  "We have a nursing crisis in America."  Abolish mandatory OT for nurses, ergonomic standards, patient-staff ratios...  (This is stuff he hasn't said as much on the trail.)


    To grow the middle class, we must grow the labor movement.  (Lots of the speech is getting applause drowned.)  Several other well-worn labor lines: "if you can join the Republican party by signing a card," etc.


    SCHIP Bush veto: "He's on the side of insurance companies, drug countries, and their lobbyists."


    Concluding with the "I run for president on behalf of" cadence.  "on behalf of the men and women who take care of our mothers and fathers and sisters and brothers and children every day."  All of 10 minutes of speech and now we have the Foo Fighters.


    6:20 and we had a four or five question media avail scrum style.  A local TV person tries to get him to get a bar for the caucuses -- "how well do you need to finish?"  Edwards doesn't bite.  He alludes to differences with other candidates on health care without naming anyone.  "We can't get universal health care without fighting against powerful entrenched interests."  SEIU endorsement means people who know how to organize in "a very aggressive way." 


    "This is not a top down endorsement," he says.  "These members know me, I've been working with them in the trenches for years."  Dismisses the lack of a national endorsement and again touts the "nearly a million members."




    "They did a great job of holding the details," said David Redlawsk of the endorsements from other states that were rolled out.  As for the lack of a national endorsement, "it was the favorite sons and daughters" (specifically Obama and Clinton)  "that kept it from the 60 percent" that SEIU needed for a national endorsement.


    As of 6:32 the brothers and sisters of SEIU are gone (there was something about a barbecue at Coralville headquarters), the music is over and the press corps is largely packed.

    Michigan Won't Take No For An Answer

    Michigan Won't Take No For An Answer

    Frustrated that their primary date leapfrogging efforts backfired when four Democratic candidates took their name off the ballot, Michigan leaders are considering a new tactic: forcing the candidates onto the ballot. Ballot Access News reports:
    Michigan legislative leaders are talking about rushing a bill through the legislature that would say that anyone discussed in the news media must be on the presidential primary ballot, unless the candidate signs a statement that he or she is not running for president.

    Would this force a Sherman statement out of fantasy candidate and new Nobel laureate Al Gore? Maybe, maybe not. But it couldn't force candidates to actually go to Michigan. The top six Democrats have signed a pledge not to campaign in states that violate the Democratic National Committee's calendar. Chris Dodd, one of the candidates who left his name on the Michigan ballot, told Iowa Independent Friday, "I haven't been to Michigan in three years, and I'm not going there."

    Meanwhile, Michigan leaders are calling the kettle black by challenging New Hampshire for... violating the calendar, writing to DNC chair Howard Dean on Friday:
    Sen. Carl Levin, Gov. Jennifer Granholm and DNC member Debbie Dingell allege that New Hampshire is set to violate the DNC's rules by moving earlier than Jan. 22.

    "We want to know what the DNC intends to do about the New Hampshire Secretary of State's decision to move forward the date of the primary to select their delegates even though that date violates the DNC rules," they wrote.

    "Michigan Democrats have always said that we would abide by the DNC's rules on the timing of the delegate selection primaries and caucuses as long as other states abided by them. That is now no longer the case."

    And the big picture of Michigan's effort, putting its issues on the table, has backfired in the case of one candidate. In an article titled "Is Obama giving Michigan brush-off?", the Detroit Free Press notes that Obama is running a new television ad in New Hampshire describing himself as the candidate who has taken on Detroit, telling automakers in their backyard how they need to build cars that squeeze more miles from a gallon of gas.
    U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, who started the battle to move Michigan's primary up, said he doesn't think the Illinois senator is writing off the state.

    "He's just shooting the dice to win in Iowa and New Hampshire. It's just more evidence of the power that those states have in this process," Levin said.

    12 Ekim 2007 Cuma

    Dodd: Father's Nuremberg Service Forged My Values

    Dodd: Father's Nuremberg Service Forged My Values

    At Chris Dodd’s Iowa City appearance Friday, he spoke more about his father than himself, using his father’s service as the number two prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials to focus on the importance of the Constitution and the rule of law.

    Larry Baker, an author and former Iowa City council member, asked the last question and said he had agreed with every word Dodd had said. But in that case, asked Baker, why aren’t George Bush and Dick Cheney being impeached?

    “I won’t argue the substance,” said Dodd “But Having been through it, it takes all of the oxygen out of the room. To be very practical, the most important thing is to elect a new administration.” Dodd predicted that a focus on impeachment would lead to Democratic defeat.



    Dodd spoke at Iowa City’s famous Prairie Lights book store, discussing “Letters From Nuremberg,” a book he wrote based on the letters his father, Thomas Dodd, wrote home to his mother during the trial of Nazi war criminals.

    Before Nuremberg, Thomas Dodd was an early FBI agent. He later worked for the Justice Department trying Southern civil rights cases. The elder Dodd was originally assigned to Nuremberg for a two-week stint, which eventually grew to the 15-month duration of the trial. After Nuremberg, Thomas Dodd served two terms in the Senate

    Chris Dodd says he didn’t know his father’s daily letters home from Germany, which he called “contemporaneous first draft of history,” existed until he just a few years ago. Before reading the letters, Dodd organized them chronologically

    “These letters are epistles to our generation about the rule of law,” said Dodd. The principles are the same. You cannot tailor your principles to the facts of the day.” Giving up our rights for the perception of safety is fundamentally flawed, he said, and in one of only a few direct references to his campaign he added, “one of my reasons to put my name forward for President was to fight for these rights.” He said too many Democrats have not done that today.

    Dodd noted that Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, the chief American prosecutor at Nuremberg, called the trials “the most significant tribute power ever gave to reason.” Contemporary history gives the Nuremberg trials a place of honor. Dodd argued they were the basis for the Marshall Plan, the World Bank, the World Court, and the United Nations and gave America a moral high ground we lack today.

    But Dodd said the trials were “very presumptuous at the time”, unpopular with the American public, and opposed by most of the Supreme Court other than Jackson. Winston Churchill argued for summary executions, the Russians wanted a kangaroo court show trial, and even top defendant Hermann Goering argued that the Nazis had done little different from previous wartime regimes.


    Senator Thomas Dodd

    Thomas Dodd felt differently. Reading from the letters, the younger Dodd described a dramatic courtroom scene where his father displayed a cloth covered table, and built up suspense over the object hidden on it for minute after minute until a young office pulled away the cloth to reveal… a shrunken human head that the commandant of the Buchenwald concentration camp had kept on his desk. As a paperweight. “It wasn’t just routine acts of violence,” Chris Dodd said, “and that changed the tenor of the trial.”

    “I would never have believed that men would be so evil,” Thomas Dodd wrote in one of the letters. “Men will read of it for a thousand years in amazement, and wonder how it ever happened.”

    “Why would you give the worst violators of human rights in history a trial, when they never did that for their victims?” Chris Dodd asked rhetorically. “Because we are different, we stand up for the rule of law.”

    Striking more personal notes, Dodd called letter writing a lost art and said his father set the bar very high. He regrets that his mother’s letters from that time were never found. “They never threw anything out,” he said, and he believes they were destroyed in a fire at a storage unit.

    Matters turned back to the 21st century and Dodd’s campaign during question and answers, as Dodd cited George Bush’s remark that the Constitution “ is only a piece of paper.” He said the Geneva Convention is critical because it protects our own troops in harm’s way, and our current policies put them in danger. “The worst info you get is the info you get from torture. There’s no better witness to that than John McCain,” he said. The world looks at the Nuremberg trials as a high point of American moral leadership, in contrast that to Abu Gharib and Guantanamo.

    Dodd argues, in a sense that civil liberties and the rule of law are literally in his blood. “All of you have been asking me a question that you don’t articulate. Who are you? What are your beliefs? What’s my DNA in a sense? I am a product of my upbringing. My father talked about Nuremberg to his six children endlessly. These views on human rights and the Constitution come from my upbringing, not from a poll.”


    Dodd answers questions while signing a book for Robin Roseman of Iowa City.

    Questions on other matters popped up as Dodd autographed copies of the book. A query on global warming prompted congratulations to Al Gore on the Nobel Peace Prize and an outline of the Dodd energy plan. “Al Gore and Bill Bradley both say our energy plan is the boldest and most honest of all the candidates,” said Dodd, making a rare these days reference to Gore’s nearly forgotten 2000 rival for the nomination. “Taxing polluters is the only way I know how to deal with this. We borrow a billion dollars a day to buy foreign oil,” and a lot of that goes to hostile nations, he said. Dodd argued his carbon tax would amount to about 10 cents a gallon, and will raise $50 billion.

    A couple in line asked the “notch baby” question of Social Security benefits for those born from 1917 to 1922. Dodd said action was unlikely and there have never been more than 40 votes in support of action. The notch baby question dominated 1988 candidate forums, when the notch babies were aged 65 to 70. Now the notch babies who are still around are 85 to 90, and the question rarely surfaces.

    "I'm sold," said Dale Shultz, a former Iowa City school board member who was waiting the the book line of about 50 and ready to back Dodd. Longtime local Democratic activist Gertrude MacQueen was also impressed with Dodd, but leaning to another candidate.

    I catch Dodd at the end of the line and check if he’s hearing anything on the sump in Iowa about his decision to stay on the Michigan ballot. Not really, says Dodd, and he feels he’s in keeping with the early state pledge he signed, noting that it was the Michigan Democrats, not himself, who placed his name on the ballot. “I haven’t been to Michigan in three years and I’m not going there.”

    I ask Dodd how his father would want to be remembered –- as a Senator, for Nuremberg, or as the father of a president? Dodd laughs at the last and cites his father’s remarks from one of the letters. “Nothing I do will ever be really as important as this,” wrote the then 38-year-old Thomas Dodd in 1946. “Someday the boys will be proud of it.” Six decades later, his son clearly was.