8 Şubat 2011 Salı

Robinson Ranks the Rs

Robinson Ranks the Rs

Fascinating series posted over the last 24 hours or so by Craig Robinson at TheIowaRepublican, the parti's quasi-official one-stop blog.

First posted sequentially, in countdown format, Robinson ranks the GOP presidential field in likeliness of caucus success. The top ten list is most notable for who's NOT included: Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee.

Here's the list and the "highlights", with a few of (my comments).

  • 10: Herman Cain: "Cain’s 2012 campaign will probably look more like what Alan Keyes’ campaign looked like in 1999 and 2000... If this was just about getting to ten names, Jon Huntsman would have made the list." (Morrie Taylor + Alan Keyes = Herman Cain.)


  • 9: John Thune: "Thune will have a better 'neighbor' advantage than Pawlenty or Bachmann would have from being for Minnesota because of his proximity to the most conservative part of the state... Those people get their news from South Dakota, so not only have they seen Thune’s campaign ads, but they are also kept abreast of what he’s doing." (Anyone else remember when Larry Pressler had the same idea?)


  • 8: Mitch Daniels: Here in Iowa, Daniels already has one big fan in Governor Terry Branstad..." (How fast will the denial come here?)


  • 7: Haley Barbour: "While many might discount Barbour’s chances to be the 2012 Republican nominee, it’s safe to say that most people would have ranked him ahead of several 2008 candidates like Sam Brownback, Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo, Tommy Thompson, Duncan Hunter, and even Mike Huckabee." (That's setting the bar pretty low, though my bet is Tommy Thompson is the best analogy.)


  • 6: Ron Paul: "While Paul will have to campaign hard to win a majority of the tea party activists in the state, it’s safe to say that nobody will have a more loyal and dedicated group of supporters than Ron Paul will have. " (Will run, may improve slightly on `08 support, but his people are basically indigestible for the eventual nominee.)


  • While we're in this mode, Nate Silver has a fascinating, four dimensional graph (must be seen to be believed) of who's competing with who for what niche. Ron Paul has a whole quadrant basically to himself. If the word "quadrant" even applies in four dimensional space:
    "It's time to move on to the next quadrant. Quadrant. Quadrant. Quad... It's a weird word when you think about it. Quadrant. Quaaadrant. Quad... See, now it doesn't even sound like a word. " -Dr. Heinz Doofenshmirtz

  • 5: Rick Santorum: "It’s the margin of Santorum 2006 defeat that’s going to be difficult to overcome, not that he lost. In fact, it’s probably an advantage that he is not associated with the 2007-2010 Congress that remains unpopular with the American people." (That's, um, a really creative argument.)


  • 4: Mitt Romney: "Romney is quickly becoming the Rudy Giuliani of the 2010 campaign. Skipping two of the first three states is not only a sign of weakness, but also a clear indication that Romney is once again going to morph into another version of himself. Making us all wonder who the real Mitt Romney is." (Oh, SNAP!)


  • 3: Tim Pawlenty: "Pawlenty’s problem is that he’s probably going to be a lot of people’s second choice. For that to benefit him, he needs to see some big-name candidates drop out." (See my impressions on TPaw from yesterday.) "Maybe the biggest obstacle that has come his way is..."


  • 2: Michele Bachmann: "A Bachmann run would create a perfect storm in Iowa. Bachmann is already the darling of the tea party, and TheIowaRepublican.com knows of one big tea party endorsement she would likely receive if she runs. When you combine that with Steve King’s statewide network of conservatives in the state it’s a recipe for success." (Presumably this fills the Palin niche?)


  • 1: Newt Gingrich: "as formidable of a caucus candidate as Iowans have ever seen. The combination of being a storyteller, historian, political operative, and excellent speaker make him the clear frontrunner in Iowa."


  • Newt Number One?!? Wow. Just wow.

    The exclusion of Huckabee and Palin is huge. I don't see both of them not running. And I also don't see both of them running. It comes dowm to whether Palin is motivated more by money or ego.

    7 Şubat 2011 Pazartesi

    Semi-Live with Tim Pawlenty

    Semi-Live with Tim Pawlenty

    Football season over, caucus season starts. The circle of life continues, and Tim Pawlenty brought his soon to be announced campaign for Secretary of Something Or Other to Iowa City.

    Nah. For president, of course. The former Minnesota governor hopes to find a sweet spot in the caucus electorate: just religious enough for the Huckabee voters, just businesslike enough for the Romney establishment, and let the other candidates mutually destruct.

    Monday leaned to the religious end of the equation as Pawlenty spoke in the Family Leader's “Presidential Lecture Series,” with stops in Pella, a nice Republican town, Sioux Center, a reeeealllly Republican town, and... Iowa City?!?

    (Administrative note: I'm sort of chronological here: the University of Iowa seems to have improved its wireless internet policy and even acknowledged the existence of Linux, or at least “Ubuntu,” but I wasn't able to hack my way in quick enough. So this is more or less live blog structured.)

    “We do not view this as a campaign stop but as an educational stop,” says Bob Vander Plaats, who to my amazement is still on speaking terms with me. Pawlenty also arrived with a few other big names: Chuck Hurley, Matt Riesetter and Chuck Larson.

    Perhaps they're hoping for a confrontation in the People's Republic; they very nearly get it from the media. At one point Vander Plaaats ijumps in to grab a question aimed at Pawlenty to defend his organization: “We sperak the truth but do it with love.”

    “I'm both a fiscal and social conservative,” says T-Paw (not to be confused with 80s one hit wonder T'Pau, named for a Star Trek original series character). “As I try to persuade people, I try to be thoughtful and respectful.” But thoughtful and respectful still comes down to: “We as a society should support traditional marriage between a man and a woman. It does not mean people who have other situations can't be successful. The point is what kind of environment makes it likely to be successful. I don't think it's radical or extreme to say marriage should be between a man and a woman.”

    That answer, uttered next to Vander Plaats, is no surprise; Family Leader is part of the somewhat confusing network of “traditional values” groups that gave you the three fired Supreme Court justices, and it's what Bob is doing these days instead of being governor or lieutenant governor.

    After press time Pawlenty was off to a closed door meeting with activists (a “clutch event” in caucus parlance). The press corps and early arrivals listened to the rally music. “I Can't go for that (No Can Do)” by Hall and Oates is presumably some sort of Republican policy statement, while Jewel singing “Am I standing still?” is a good question if you're at the asterisk level in the polls. (But Jewel Kilcher isn't the woman from Alaska that Pawlenty needs to worry about.)

    Monday's event is the first in the series of “Presidential lectures” that BVP is sponsoring across the state. Thy're starting low key but the next two should be pandemonium: Ron Paul on March 7 and Michele Bachman on April 11. Bachmann. In Iowa freakin' City.

    We're going photoless today – the 2nd floor IMU ballroom has terrible lighting and my hobby-level camera can't capture it. If someone wants to get me a big time writing gig I'll use the proceeds and buy professional equipment, I swear.

    At 3:52 the local GOP dignitaries file in from the clutch event. That brings our body count to 75 or so– more townie than student despite the campus location. Proportionally, press interest seems bigger.

    Showtime at 3:55. BVP takes the intro. “Strong marriages lead to strong families lead to a strong society. We always try to communicate in the right tone.” (Or as I said the other week, the tone is Fred Phelps with cookies).

    “I really hope he does get in the race,” Vander Plaats says of T-Paw, “but that's not an endorsement,” At least not until Huckabee makes his decision, I mutter.

    Tpaw takes over at 3:59. He congratulates the guy in the Aaron Rogers shirt; I applaud pretty much by myself.

    As he touches on the basics of biography, Pawlenty seems to be saying one very long sentence, with lots of 'ands' connecting.

    “We have been the free-est and most prosperous nation in the world's history We need to restore America's freedom, goodness and common sense.” American Exceptionalism all around, but if Obama's doing it too it must be OK..

    “This is a country that was founded Under God. That's not just my opinion, it's in our founding documents. That example is repeated over and over in the early history of our country,” Pawlenty says, claiming that 49 of our 50 states mention God in their constitutions (the implication is that means preambles, but he doesn't specify.) The pauses are few – wonder how he'd handle an applause line? But he didn't get any interruptions, not even when he's talking about “traditional marriage.”

    “When we talk about family matters, it also touches on other issues. It's important to have a strong economy so moms and dads can have jobs.” He doesn't say single people and childless couples can rot, but he doesn't say they need jobs either. Still, not as bad as “heterosexual couples can accidentally reproduce.” It made me wonder how much of the Pawlenty Stump Speech (still nascent in form) is being skewed by the specific demands of the Vander Plaats-led event.

    “We want a culture that celebrates life. We want to do those things that protect life and I'm proud to say I'm pro-life.”

    “We shouldn't ask politicians who've never been in the private sector. Ask the entrepreneurs, farmers, people with small businesses. And the thing those people say is 'make my costs more competitive.' In the United States our costs need to go down not up, to make it the kind of place where jobs want to go. You can't be pro jobs and anti business. That's like being pro egg and anti chicken.” The obvious laugh line doesn't get a reaction. Salmon are funnier.

    In general, Pawlenty sounds more sincere on the economic and education stuff than on the social stuff. And as for education, he just lost my official middle of the road barometer: my retired teacher parents by talking about home schools and charter schools. “We need to break up this lethargic government monopoly.” But the caucus base should love it.

    He closes by riffing on the Reagan inauguration; everyone wants to grab that mantle this week. Apperantly the force of Ronnie's sunny personality was enough to make the clouds part the second Jimmy Carter left office. Or something like that; there was a broader point but nothing that I could capture in a phrase.

    Q and A at 4:20. So much for confrontation: All questions were submitted in writing and Vander Plaats is reading them. That might work for this particular event, but advice to T-Paw: real caucus goers, on both sides, like to do the asking themselves, and they like to know that the other people doing the asking are genuine. It's in the U.S. Constitution that a true test of presidential leadership is your ability to handle a question from a crazy person in Iowa City.

    Greatest threat to and asset for families: “Families are stressed out. They're worried about time, money and stability.” Refers to “Sam's Club Republicans,” (meaning small business owners and families that are just getting by. “They want the best value they can get for their money, so they can save money for things that are more important that I can invest back in my family.” He mentioned seeing carts loaded with Doritos, which apparantly are the best value for your money.

    But it really all comes back to tax cuts. “One thing that really pressures family is health care.” Complains that Obama broke a promise because health care was not bipartisan, which takes some real chutzpah. He also says it's “government run.” Now we're into pants on fire territory.

    Next question from BVP: College affordability. T-Paw: “Why are costs at a public university going up 7 to 12% a year when the rest of the economy is hardly growing at all?” “The system doesn't require as much productivity from faculty as it should.” Wants “measurable” research results, emphasis on measurable. Works in sabbaticals as well. “Every university can't be everything to everybody anywhere.” Also talks about cutting staff benefits: “Public employes used to be over benefited and underpaid. Now they're overbenefited and overpaid. You can't have public employees getting paid better than the people paying the bill.” (Did Branstad HQ write this?)Says of college classrooms: “ridiculous prices sometimes with ridiculous propositions on the curriculum.”

    Stem cells. “Most of the things that have been most promising have come from adult stem cells. The science and technogy is actually leapfrogging the debate” The question didn't specify adult vs. embryonic, so Pawlentyu gets away with it.

    Deficit. “You can't spend 1.5 trillion more than you brought in. A lot of that was stimulus money that maintained govt bureaucracies.” But still says shouldn't cut military. “Anyone who says they're not going to touch entitlements is not telling you the truth. It's not an easy thing to do but we have to look the American public in the eye.”

    Vander Plaats holds up a card for one last question and, incredibly, makes a joke about Karnak The Magnificent. The students in the crowd were barely born when Johnny Carson retired in 1992. It's Egypt. Tpaw discusses multiple Middle East trips (but not Egypt) “What was the plan? It's fair to say Mubarak's time was, to be charitable about it, winding down.” Team Obama's initial reactions seemed confused and conflicting. “We need to follow our principles and priorities” which are 1) minimize risk of radical Islamic regime 2) freedom and democracy (“but you can't just flip a switch when there's been no infrastructure. There needs tyo be some interim time”)

    I can see this guy being a lot of people's second choice. But with a secret caucus straw vote, instead of the Democrat's complex realignment system, second choices matter less on the GOP side.

    Vicarious Happiness

    Vicarious Happiness



    I stumble into work on a Monday morning and pull off my green and gold coat. "Congratulations," people say, as if I somehow had anything to do with it. Like I broke my collar bone making that tackle at the end of the first half, or scooped up that fumble to grab the game momentum back after that awful third quarter.

    The vicarious psychology of the sports fan fascinates me even as I indulge in it. "We" won. Not "they," not "the Packers": "WE."

    It's an accident of the time and place I came from, really: Wisconsin at the height of the Vince Lombardi era (though my actual birth was during the interregnum in the team's five championships in seven years). Dad was a high school coach and ball games were part of day to day life for us.

    So we grew up with the Packers, through the dreadful 70s and the frustrating 80s. Dad's an offensive line guy. Everyone else sees the big run; Dad sees the block that made it happen. He taught us that it was better to do than to watch, and rarely gave up on a fishing or golfing trip to sit in front of the TV. If the weather was nice we'd bring the radio along and listen on the lake.

    If it was cold or rainy, we'd turn down the TV sound and listen to the radio play by play from Packer announcer Max McGee. He was the improbable hung-over hero of the first "NFL-AFL Championship Game" -- not even the "Super Bowl" yet, let alone a Roman numeral. Max was a classic "homer" announcer with no pretense at objectivity, and that's what we wanted: to hear him cheering on "our" Packers.

    And it's those memories, more than the hired hands in the uniforms, that I was really cheering for yesterday. The connection is entirely vicarious. The contracts expire, the bidding begins, the players move on. That's especially true for us Packers fans, booing our one-time hero because he now wears a purple number 4 shirt instead of a green one. We have always been at war with Eastasia, star-bellied Sneetches have always been better than plain-bellied Sneetches.

    Yet millions of us get caught up in it, our moods wildly swinging from elation to despair based on the performance of a few dozen physically abnormal, incredibly well paid men who most often have no real identification with or relationship to the team's town beyond some high profile feel-good PR/charity projects.

    But the team stays. The fans stay and still say "We won". The tears on their faces as "We Are The Champions" plays are genuine.

    A huge question mark hands over football's future. Money disputes between players and management may scuttle the next season. I can't even pretend to understand the dollars and egos involved, though my thoughts on sports economics are best summed up by Chris Rock, explaining the difference between riches and wealth: "Shaq is rich. The white man who signs his check is wealthy."

    So this particular collection of Packers may not get the chance to defend their title. But for today, at least, even though my joy is vicarious, it's no less real.

    4 Şubat 2011 Cuma

    Dahms for Dems

    Dahms for Dems

    Delayed update from last night's meeting of the Johnson County Democrats: Terry Dahms announced his candidacy for county chair.

    Dahms has made a couple runs at elected office, running for supervisor in the 2008 Democratic primary. His true claim to fame, however, is his fall through the cracks of democracy in 2006: Dahms finished second of three candidates for the soil and water commission, in a race for two seats, yet lost because of an obscure provision of state law limiting that board to one member per township. Two offices you can win with less votes than your opponent: soul and water commissioner and President of the United States.

    Undeterred, Dahms is now on the appointed Planning and Zoning commission. The county chair election is March 3rd; incumbent Dennis Roseman announced last month he's not seeking a second term.

    3 Şubat 2011 Perşembe

    Thursday's Clips

    Thursday's Clips



    If you're dug out yet, and you're not going to the Democratic Central Committee tonight, here's an evening activity at the Law School:

    “The New Politics of Iowa’s Judicial Retention Elections”

    Thursday, Feb. 3
    7:00 PM
    Boyd Law Building, Levitt Auditorium

    Panelists:
    Michael Streit, formerly of the Iowa Supreme Court
    Seth Andersen, Exec. Director, American Judicature Society
    Kathie Obradovich, columnist, The Des Moines Register
    Brian Fitzpatrick, Professor, Vanderbilt Law School
    David Perlmutter, Professor and Chair of the UI School of Journalism and Mass Communication
    Moderated by Professor Todd Pettys, UI College of Law

    The event is cosponsored by law student groups: American Constitution Society, The Federalist Society, The Iowa Student Bar Association, and The Outlaws.
    The ridiculous on the issue didn't end with the House vote, as Craig Robinson plays the hillbilly incest card:
    Since Iowa’s marriage laws currently say nothing about same-sex marriages, there is nothing that prevents a man from marrying his father, his father’s brother, his brother, and nothing preventing a woman from marrying her mother, her mother’s sister or her own sister.
    Everybody, sing it with me, I am my own grandpa.

    David Broder, who's old enough to your grandpa's grandpa, yearns for the good ole days of favorite son candidates and puts Terry Branstad in the Pawlenty camp. Meanwhile, others at the Post notice that Iowa teabaggers aren't like other teabaggers.

    But the most important Iowa political news of the day: Census details due next week...

    2 Şubat 2011 Çarşamba

    In Wisconsin We Call This Football Weather

    In Wisconsin We Call This Football Weather

    I can only see the nationwide blizzard as a good omen for Sunday. It seems all of America, even western Pennsylvania, is now Frozen Tundra.

    Garbage-man Butch Vig has updated his stadium anthem "Go Pack Go" and you may see some unexpected Packer fans in the video:



    (Audio only here.)

    I'd say this ranks right up there with "Nevermind" and "Siamese Dream" as one of Vig's finest productions. But for the record, Jesus no longer drinks Old Style as they stopped making it it God's Country (a/k/a La Crosse) in 1998. Only Bears fans drink Old Style anymore. The Lord will, however, occasionally have a La Crosse City instead.

    As for "Go Pack Go," the update was a necessity according to Butch: "In our original version, in the middle break, there were all these references to Favre, so we went back in and did a new version about a month ago, and deleted, of course, any references to Favre." Of course.

    1 Şubat 2011 Salı

    Dropping all pretense

    Dropping all pretense

    Last week, in anticipation of the debate of the last 24 hours, I wrote: "Drop the pretense that this is about anything other than prejudice. Get up on the House floor, say 'I hate fags,' and sit back down. It’ll save us all time and it’ll be more honest."

    That's now happened, as the ugly, hateful side of our state emerged.

    Mark Doland of Oskaloosa complained that, paraphrasing, 'he pulled his child out of school and is having to pay thousands of dollars to educate his child because somebody at a public school taught his child that it is all right to be gay.'

    “Telling people in the medical field that they have to perform services that go against their beliefs? Whose rights are more important? It will filter into all aspects of life, school, medicine. At some point enough is enough. My rights are under siege,” said Karen Mogenhan of Montrose, who apparantly believes her "right" to have her prejudices officially sanctioned by the state is more important than a gay Iowans right to, well, be alive.

    "I don’t think we should open it up and let the people who have a sinful lifestyle … have a special (sic) right," said David Selmon of the Word of Life Church in Burlington. He can preach what he wants there, though Christ Himself was silent on the subject of gay marriage. But state sponsorship of his theology is another matter.

    The hate in the public hearing was bad enough, but it reared its head on the house floor as well, where Judiciary chair Rich Anderson played everything short of the bestiality card: "a male and a female can do something that a homosexual couple cannot: They can create children accidentally. That’s the issue. It’s not about love. It’s not about romance. It’s about driving state policy toward responsible procreation."

    You better believe it's not about love. Not today.

    The only good thing that came out of the last 24 hours was the heartfelt conversion of Jeff Angelo, the former Republican state senator who testified against the amendment he once voted for:
    This debate centers around the devaluation of the lives of a select group of people. At its worst, we are being asked to believe that our gay friends and neighbors are involved in a nefarious agenda. The outcome of which, supposedly, is the unraveling of society itself. My friends, Iowans are discomforted by this debate. We know it not to be true.
    Angelo is a true conservative who understands that the proposed amendment is the ulitimate in big government: "It does not restrain government intrusion in the lives of law-abiding citizens and therefore it violates the very purpose of our Iowa Constitution."

    But for most "conservatives," that's not what this debate is about. I'm relieved, in a way, that the House vote is over. I've always wanted more brutal honesty in politics, and the witnesses and legislators were brutally honest: we hate gay people.

    Sixty-two Iowa state representatives, including "Democrats" Kurt Swaim, Dan Muhlbauer and Brian Quirk, are formally on the record as bigots. "Sometimes when I represent my district I have to differ from other members of my caucus that come from more liberal parts of the state,” Swaim said by way of excuse.

    And sometimes leaders have to lead, too. That's what Mike Gronstal is doing, and Council Bluffs ain't exactly Iowa City. Here's hoping that the 26 Democratic senators are more courageous than Swaim, Quirk and Muhlbauer, and that a few Republicans are as brave as Jeff Angelo.